In the last two chapters I covered why a true cutter is a great rig for short-handed offshore voyaging and how to decide if the cutter rig is right for you.
Now I'm going to cover what it takes to successfully convert a sloop or even a ketch to get most, or maybe even all, of the benefits that we true cutter owners are so damned smug about.
Also, if you have a cutter, but are less than happy with her, read on. Making a cutter rig work really well, like so many things in offshore voyaging, requires getting the details right, and that's what this chapter is all about.
Thanks John, that’s a lot of thought and education for me with my old wooden cutter. Up to now I’ve been thinking of the staysail and the running backstays as generally more of an impediment than a help, especially when single handed, but you’ve made me realise I should be paying more attention to them, and maybe even start using the winches!
Keep up the good work.
Thank you, John. Gratitude is a Brewer 44 ketch. She is rigged with a baby stay and tracks that look (from the pictures) like they are well placed. We have dual winches on each side and have a staysail, which we (sorry to admit) have never flown because, when we are offshore, the dinghy is on the foredeck and there is so much stuff up forward. Do you have any experience running a Brewer as a “cutter”? Ted Brewer insists it not be called a cutter ketch, but rather an ketch rig with a double foresail plan. Any thoughts and recommendations would be welcome as, when we are offshore, there usually is enough time to tinker with a rig!
Hi Edward,
No I have not sailed a Brewer 44, but I know the boat and would expect her to do just fine with a cutter rig, once you get it set up right, as above.
Hi John,
Great article, I love my cutter, and find that my boat points at least 5 degrees higher when sailed as a cutter, rather than as a sloop.( I have a removable inner forestay with a Highfield lever for tensioning it) . I have a hanked on staysail , which I prefer on smaller cutter, say under 40 ft. This allows one to have a hanked on storm jib, if things get seriously windy. I appreciate the need for a furling staysail on larger boats, but would always prefer a hanked on storm jib. I have been thinking about replacing my 1x 19 SS running backstays with Spectra or Dyneema. I have not seen any cutters yet that have done so, but there could be a lot of advantages. Any thoughts on that?
Hi Bill,
We replaced out wire runners with high tech rope some 10 years ago and would never go back to wire. You can see ours in the picks above.
The big advantage is that being lighter they don’t slap around and therefore don’t try to jump out of our hands as we run them forward.
I’ll mention the old fashioned boomed staysail again here since it can eliminate the sheeting track issue and also offers other advantages.
We have a wishbone boomed staysail that sheets to a fixed point. We use twings that lead aft through blocks attached at the inner shroud chainplates for fine adjustments when the wind is forward of the beam and use a preventer when it’s further aft.
The twings don’t need winchs since we can ease the sheet slightly, adjust the twing to its pre-marked position and harden in the sheet again. Excellent sail control on all points of wind.
Like any other system there are disadvantages but it really works well for us and is another option worth considering.
Hi Pat
I’m attracted to the wishbone boom as it makes self-tacking elegantly simple and does away with a lot of deck gear. It limits the area to non-overlapping, but that I would easily accept on a staysail. My main concern is how to carry the loads from the forward end of the wishbone boom. Is yours attached to the stay? Wouldn’t that push the stay forwards at that spot, causing deformation of the sail? Or has the sail been shaped with that in mind? Or have you got some other smart system I haven’t yet thought of?
Hi Stein
The forward end of our wishbone connects to a SS tube that slides up the 7×7 wire rope stay. It is slightly bowed, has flared ends and a plastic inner sleeve that extends above and below to better distribute the distortion of the stay.
Yes, our sail is cut to allow for the distortion of the stay but I’ve seen a number of wishbone staysails where the piston hanks were simply attached with different lengths of lashing to allow for this.
Hi Pat
That attachment method seems good. I think the wear on the wire will be no more than it is at the exits of the terminals, so it will most likely not reduce the working life of the wire. But I still have some questions. 🙂
A sail shaped for the bend in the stay or adjusted at the hanks, will of course be just as well shaped as with any other configuration, but how is the behaviour with different loads and trim tensions on the sail? If you tension the boom outhaul (if that’s the correct English term?) it will increase the push on the stay. Will that make the sail shape uneven so you have to tension the stay, or am I wrong?
Also, I assume you don’t reef the staysail, but keep it either full or take it down? If you reef it, I guess the boom must come down with the sail? Do you know of methods to facilitate reefing?
Hi Stein
I haven’t noticed any significant distortion of the luff area due to thrust of the wishbone on the forestay when adjusting outhaul tension.
I must admit I am not a fanatic sail trim person but the sail always looks OK.
I don’t reef my staysail (I’ve never had to) but can see no reason why not and may well put reefing points on the next one. The bottom portion would remain in place and you would reef the luff and leech down to the boom.
Hi Pat,
I have to confess that I’m a jib boom hater, part of my fixation on clear decks. Having said that, I agree that there are benefits, but to me they are outweighed by the disadvantages. I suspect that in the final analysis, despite my prejudices, it all comes down to personal preference.
Hi John
I understand your dislike of clutter but have found that when it’s not in use the wishbone is a useful handhold amidships when moving about on the foredeck . When it’s in use it’s no more ‘in the way’ than the sail itself.
Hi John.
Another good post, as always.
I’ll just give a comment on the polyester vs epoxy topic, and health issues. There is no doubt that epoxy is a better material. Tolerates higher compressive loads, is stiffer but still stretches more without cracking, adheres better, impregnates the fibres better, is watertight (polyester is as watertight as a very dense sponge) and more.
Of course I prefer epoxy, but still there are potential problems. One should be careful with relatively fresh polyester. Even up to a couple of years old, it may in some cases contain enough styrene to damage the epoxy. The styrene evaporation is what gives the stench when polyester hardens, and the characteristic “plastic” smell in new boats. In sufficient amounts, it will soften the epoxy structure permanently.
Most epoxies will cure fine in room temperature with no added pressure and mechanical properties clearly better than any polyester. Still, if cured under pressure (like vacuum bagging) and high temperature (preferably at least 50 degrees C / 120 F) the strength will normally double or triple. Applying those conditions are normally close to impossible in an existing boat. As mentioned, epoxy is still better than polyester, but many boat builders will relate to how it “should be done” and then advice for polyester. They can be honest and even not lazy, just “emotional”. 🙂 Polyester also hardens faster, so the work process is faster, thus cheaper. With epoxy, you frequently have to wait overnight or more.
For self-builders, there is another big problem with epoxy: It’s an extremely strong allergen. Polyester smells really bad, so it’s easy to notice that one should not inhale the fumes but use ventilation and protective gear. Most epoxies make way less fumes and they don’t smell strong, even while curing. Still you need to be more careful. Epoxy fumes and uncured epoxy is serious stuff. If you get wet epoxy on your skin, nothing much happens, normally. It’s sticky but not too hard to wash off. Use water and soap. Alternatively the cleaning stuff used by car mechanics etc. NEVER use any solvent to clean your skin. It will penetrate your skin and bring both solvent and epoxy into your blood. It’s like drinking it!
If you’re sensitive or are repeatedly exposed to epoxy, you will sooner or later get serious skin rashes or blisters. This is an allergic reaction, which epoxy provokes very efficiently. The trouble is that when you had that reaction once, you’re permanently allergic to epoxy, and frequently you will trigger other allergies too. I’ve managed to escape this, by being totally “nazi” with cleanliness and protection, but many of my sailing friends have serious problems with allergies from epoxy exposure. They do have continuous problems with it and wish they had been more careful.
One common bad thing to do is sand hardened epoxy and inhale some of the dust. At “room temperature” 23 degrees Centigrade, 73 Fahrenheit, almost all epoxies will need more than a week to cure fully. The “fast cure” ones too. The epoxy will harden much sooner, but a full cure takes time unless the temperature is significantly higher. Also, a complete cure depends on a thorough mixing of the resin and hardener. If you breathe in not fully cured epoxy dust, you get chemically active particles in your lungs. Not good. After a full cure, it’s way less harmful.
I’m not trying to say that you should avoid epoxy, but I can’t overemphasise this: You are dealing with a chemical reaction that is a really bad match for your body. Being relaxed about it is not smart. To make things worse, being totally clean when working with epoxy is hard. You need to establish methods that work for you and your specific task. If you work inside a boat, I’d use a hose to extract air from further inside the boat than where you are working. That way there will be a continuous flow of air across the work area and away from you. A vacuum cleaner is good enough. Placed it outside the boat, away from where fresh air flows in, with a long hose. Preferably remove the dust collecting bag etc, to increase flow.
You need to use gloves, of course. I normally use “surgical gloves”, those you can buy in most pharmacies. Latex is useless, as epoxy will penetrate them quickly. Vinyl is clearly better, but will also be penetrated. The by far best is “Nitrile rubber”. If you wear thin cotton gloves inside, it will increase the duration of the gloves. Sweaty hands will speed up penetration. Either way, change cloves frequently, depending on how much exposure, but at least every 10 minutes if you get epoxy on them. Use a blocking cream on your hands and lower arms. Use clothes you can dispose of or clean efficiently. Make sure you breathe fresh air. In some situations, a full face mask is smart, those plastic sheets that just cover. Cheap stuff. Make sure you can work without stress. Stress will make you cut corners. Then you will be exposed.
If you take proper care, epoxy is an amazing material and building stuff is great fun! Good luck!
Hi Stein,
Lot’s of good information, thank you. One of the reasons I recommended the west system products and manuals is that they do a really good job of explaining the safety precautions that we must take when using epoxy.
Also, west even have a manual on how to use vacuum bags.
One thing, I think I’m right in saying that temperature and speed of cure don’t have any measurable effect on strength, at least of West epoxy.
And even if they do, for the applications we are talking about, I don’t think it matters much. On the boats we are dealing with here, if there is any doubt at all, just up the strength of the upgrade or repair.
Bottom line, I fixed an old racing boat with really bad structural issues with the west system and found it all pretty easy and very forgiving to use. And at the end of the project the boat was far, far stronger than she was when new.
Hi John
You are completely right on what cure methods mean for this type of use. Epoxy is a structurally very good material no matter how it’s cured. The reason for using higher temps and pressure is not that it’s necessary but that it’s possible and gives improvements. These improvements are important when the epoxy is used like with carbon in a mast, where its physical properties need to be fully exploited.
All epoxies, also West, change their properties with higher temp cures. The data sheets for professional users show this. It’s a property of the base resin. It gets harder and at the same time tolerates more compression and stretch. The purer the epoxy is, the stronger this effect is. The main reason for mentioning it was that it might be why pro users are hesitant to using epoxy in areas they can’t get the max strength out of it. That reason is irrelevant, though. Just a bad excuse to avoid a more work intensive material.
The West Epoxy is primarily aimed at amateurs, so they are good at adapting to that. Lots of good info. I would also recommend their products. Another producer that has some of that focus, but not quite as good on the info, is SP Systems. They also work some with the high-end pros, have a larger spectrum of products and own some of the factories themselves.
Both of these are definitely high on price though. Buying from other sources via industrial channels may lower prices to less than a fourth, or much more, but normally means you need to buy it in barrels and the level of service, users equipment and info is as much lower as the price. You’re expected to know more than the provider. For the use we are talking about here, this is normally a bad solution and West etc will be better even on price, as you can buy small quantities.
Hi John,
Yes, that is a problem I have with my SS runners. My method of securing them in the stowed, unused, position, entails passing a hook with a wire strop through the lower eye, and then tensioning them aft ,with a small tackle. It can be a bit of a struggle in rough seas. When you mention ” high tech” rope, what exactly are you using? I too, am totally against staysail booms, bloody dangerous things in my experience. The dangers far outweigh any self tacking benefits, especially offshore.
I have a 6500nm delivery to N.Z. on a nice cutter later this month, looking forward to that.
Hi Bill,
Staysail boom haters unite! 🙂
Sorry, I’m not exactly sure which high tech rope we used. With these things I just tend to trust our rigger, but I can probably find out if it’s important. I’m pretty sure it was not Spectra because of the creep problems, and I know it was not PBO, because Jay doesn’t trust the stuff. I think it may be Technora.
Hi John,
We sail a cutter formatted Hylas 47. Two up this sail plan is a dream. I was considering changing my runners to high tech line but am flummixed about how they would get attached up aloft. Currently the rigging wire versions are on T terminals, which fit into slots in the mast. I suppose there must be T terminal fittings that can attach to line but I have not managed to find any – maybe not looked hard enough?
any thoughts / ideas would be welcome.
Geoff
Hi Geoff,
Hum, I don’t know, but I have to think that there must be a solution for this. Anyone else have any ideas?
I guess, in a worst case, you could have a rigger make up a short wire adapter from T terminal to an eye and then splice the high tech rope to the eye. Not very elegant, but should work.
Hi Geoff,
I believe that you are looking for a “T ball bail”. There are a few different types that will show up if you google it but then you can splice directly to it or form a thimble through the bail.
Eric
Great article, and pertinent to my situation. I have a Whitby 42 (that you may know, BTW) that had the mizzen decommissioned. The two static aft stays, I believe, could act very much like running backstays. The removable inner forestay was replaced with a permanent unit (secured below as you mentioned), but does not stand parallel to the forestay/furler. I’m cognitive that this could cause issues with tacking/gybing, but wonder what other performance/trim issues this might present?
Rob
Hi Rob,
I guess it depends exactly where the top of the staysail stay terminates and how much off parallel the two stays are. If the answer is a lot, then I think that’s going to be a big performance hit and going with a true cutter rig might be a mistake.
Stein, Wonderful dissertation on safety and some of the characteristics of the adhesives.
Bill, We use high tech rope for our runners and have been very happy with them.
Stein, I would also argue against a wishbone rig for all the reasons mentioned. The staysail is just much to easy to tack: with good timing I hand snub most of it in and winch the last few inches, to warrant the extra gear and the danger of something hard flailing about the foredeck.
My best, Dick Stevenson, s/v Alchemy
Hi Dick
Thanks. 🙂
I agree that a staysail is very easy to tack, but it still takes one person to do it at the right moment. Sailing alone, that’s not always easy, so self-tacking has its value and I have used a lot of different systems that work ok, but not yet tried a wishbone boom, so finding someone with experience makes me curious. I mostly sail multihulls, like solo sailing and I’m a total speed addict, so I know my priorities are not the same as normal cruisers, but maybe still interesting to explore the possibility. Wishbone booms interest me for three reasons:
1. A track is the normal alternative for self-tacking, but clutter the decks badly, are ugly, expensive, vulnerable and unreliable.
2. The wishbone boom has no friction, so the sail will tack without trouble.
2. The sail will be perfectly shaped even at wider angles. Just let out the sail and it’s ready to work at another angle. No need for barber hauls and non-stop balancing of multiple ropes.
To me, it seems that a wishbone boom might give some big advantages that might be important enough to accept the disadvantage of having something moving around there. We either way accept that the main sail must have a boom that is a much bigger risk to us, as it’s mostly moving in the same area as our heads. 🙂
“The sail will be perfectly shaped even at wider angles. Just let out the sail and it’s ready to work at another angle. No need for barber hauls and non-stop balancing of multiple ropes.”
This was what I hoped for but hasn’t been my experience and by the sounds of it you are much keener than me!
I use haulers when close hauled to adjust leech tension and control sail twist and I usually use a preventer when off the wind.
So, yes, there are lines to adjust but these can be done at your leisure after tacking.
Hi Pat
I used to do racing as a profession, so I’m more keen on trim and details than most sailors. Meaning that I can be quite annoying when cruising. 🙂 But I still do enjoy cruising, as long as the boat works well and is used right. That’s why I’m interested in discussions here.
Preventers will naturally be useful, but I’d assume nothing else that needs attention after a tack…? An adjustable rope from the rear end of the wishbone boom, along the foot of the sail and attached to the base of the head stay, could keep the leech and twist as you want it.
Hi Stein
Yes, I’m sure you would be maddening when cruising – constantly adjusting sail trim :).
Yes, a vang should theoretically keep the leech as wanted but will not control twist effectively. Sheeting from a central point limits control. I don’t find the barber haulers a problem since we are very rarely tacking repeatedly.
Hi Stein,
Just to clarify, tacking the way Dick and I do it, It doesn’t ” takes one person to do it at the right moment”. I tack our boat single handed all the time and the staysail just hangs out aback until I get around to dealing with it. No urgency or right moment at all.
For me the loss of easily reefing and furling the staysail is a complete killer of the wishbone boom idea. One of the coolest parts of the way we are set up is that we can quickly adjust the staysail size to get the boat the heave-to quietly in all conditions.
Hi Stein,
I think you may be better served with a self-tacking jib idea. Many production cruisers are now offering neat implementations ( have a look at Hanse for ideas) where the track is moulded onto the coach roof, with a narrow sheeting angle. The only compromise is the staysail/jib cannot overlap the mast which may reduce performance. I do not believe modern self-tackers clutter the decks since they do not come out beyond the line of the coach- roof.
We would have fitted a moulded track on our sloop and gone with a self-tracker, but we have no runners and instead a foreward “baby stay” to stop the mast inverting in extreme conditions, which prevents this.
I’m with John on the jib boom idea.
Rob
Hi Rob
Having sailed a Hanse sloop with a self tacking headsail I comment that it is not a good solution.
It may be better for a staysail.
Interesting, this hasn’t been my experience in NZ Pat, but anyway – not my problem as we didn’t go down this track!
Rob
Hi Rob
I’ve tried a lot of different self-tacking systems. On small boats some of them work fairly ok if they are maintained well. On bigger boats, especially for long distance, I strongly doubt that it’s smart to have any of those. Those tracks are quite vulnerable. A bit of sand will destroy it quickly. Even the slightest disturbance will stop the automatic tacking. When you have to run on deck to kick them over, you don’t feel helped…
I’ve never tried a wishbone boom solution, apart from on windsurfers, but they are interesting in several ways. The most important advantage over tracks, apart from being much less vulnerable, is that it will let the sail keep its shape even at very wide angles with no barber hauls etc. The short tracks in the cabin top of some cruisers are only suitable for max upwind. That’s not frequently useful for cruising.
I’m a big fan of the cutter rig, but I’m also investigating alternative layouts, mostly suitable for fast catamarans, where overlapping sails are generally not too useful either way. That (and general curiosity) is my reason for being interested in details about wishbone solutions.
Hi Stein,
I agree the sheeting can be narrow narrow, and needs to be coupled with an off wind sail like a Code zero. In stronger winds (especially on a cat) I think the sheeting angle will be sufficient and the jib/ staysail being open in the head will not be a big issue. I raced on a 10m yacht class here in NZ with self-tacking jibs, and never had an issue. Why should jib tracks jam any more than mainsail tracks which nearly every yacht has?
The thought of a substantial jib boom sweeping our foredeck at knee height is much more worrying to me than any self-tacking jib issue. In the final analysis, we chose to keep things simple and opted for a conventionally rigged 100% jib. This tacks so quickly that a self-tracker / jib boom didn’t offer enough to warrant the cost/ added complexity.
Cheers
Hi Rob
Self tackers and wishbones are probably off topic, and I feel guilty for keeping this going on, but one more comment:
I love simplicity almost as much as I love speed, 🙂 so I think a convensional sheet system on a cutter staysail is a good solution, probably the best in most cases. My interest in a wishbone boom is mostly connected to other rather uncenventional layouts, but Pat here likes his setup, so it must have some merit.
I’ve sailed racing multihulls with heavy duty mainsail tracks, longer than the LOA of some cruisers. Even those do jam slightly sometimes, but the consequences are normally minimal. The mainsail traveller only needs to move in gybes etc, when the sheet is looser, friction lower and the power pushing them out is always sufficient, as long as there is any wind. Upwind it stays in the centre. No movement.
A jib track needs to move under max tension, has much tighter angles and must move to the exact same spot every time. It gets less push the closer it is to the end stops and frequently rope tension increases at the same time. Good jib tracks with good control systems do do it perfectly, most of the time, but a trickier task means they fail way more often. A long distance cruiser can easily live with that, but I think the advantages are not worth the disadvantages. I think we agree on most of this topic. 🙂
Hi Rob
The Hanse set up wasn’t bad with full sail and going to windward.
With it partially furled or off the wind I found the sheeting point was far from ideal.
Pat
my cutter experience is essentially nil hence this basic question re cutter tacking: I’m sure the stay sail tacks easily but not so with the Genny or the job top ? seems will need to furl this in enough to clear the inner stay then roll it back out once on the new tack ? pls pardon my ignorance on this…also do you know if matt has seen my question about sail drive prop efficiency I posted on his recent article re props ? would appreciate having his take on this when he can…cheers
richard in Tampa bay
Hi Richard,
No, it is not necessary to furl the jib top to tack. I described the procedure under #8 in this post.
We were out on another test sail yesterday and found even with a staysail stay relatively close to the forestay (about two feet or 60 cm.), it was fairly straightforward to tack (we haven’t done it for some time). To gybe is a different story, but the idea of letting the staysail back until the jib topsail is through (and in fact using the staysail as a sort of ramp to “help” the process) is quite practical. I explained “#8” to my wife and she grasped it immediately and wondered why a lot of people furl to tack. This pleased me.
I also agree about staysail and main. Sure, you can’t point well, but it’s a lot more stately a progress if things are getting a touch hairy.
You may be interested in the sail plan of my boat:
https://numawan.wordpress.com/2007/09/30/le-plan-de-voilure-the-sail-plan/#more-4
John … Great piece on cutter rigs – i’ve been following this closely after considering a conversion (currently have 135 Genoa and 10o Staysail, both on furlers) for a Hylas 49 … Been trying to solve several problems, boat tacks like a dog getting the 135 through the slot, frequently I’m short handed (my wife and I) and the 135 gets to be a handful in a blow, sails are pretty blown out anyway – so looking for a new set…. Have you ever seen you recommended arrangement (100-110 Yankee + Staysail ) rigged on a Hylas 49 ?
Hi BP,
I don’t have any experience with Hylas 49, but, as I remember, the hull is based on the 1980s Stevens 47, a sweet offshore boat. Also, the underwater body is somewhat similar to our boat. Bottom line being that I think the boat will work very well set up the same way we are as a cutter.
Great article John.
In TS Bill 25-35+ close reaching in the meander in Marion Bermuda this year with our brand new 9oz full dimension staysail we often unrolled our 133% #2 laminate Genoa which became a small topsail. For reaching the staysail is trimmed to the Genoa track just aft of the shrouds and the reefed jib is sheeted to the rail.
As the aging #2 Genoa breathed its last just as we crossed the line at St Davids, we will be ordering a harmonious topsail for the staysail. The new adjustable Genoa cars will move to new staysail tracks on the coach roof as you suggest. Since our J42 may be slimmer at the waist than Morgan’s Cloud, could you please let us know the sheeting angle close hauled of your staysail and topsail? Some proportioning will help sighting our new cabin tracks.
Cheers
Bill
SV ComverJence
Hi Bill,
Sounds like a plan.
Actually, on a beam to length ratio basis, MC is probably no wider that your J42. In fact she maybe narrower, at least if we use overall length for L.
Be that as it may, I don’t know the exact sheeting angle, but anyway, I think it would be a mistake just to copy our track position, particularly on boats this different. Rather, as I say in the article, get your sail designer to specify the sheeting angle. They should know since sheeting angle is fundamental to sail design.
To Geoff Skinner
I have T fittings with an eye to facilitate splicing line, from Gibb via Sailing Services, Miami.
You have to know the size of your socket.
Fair Winds
To Geoff Skinner
re: T end fittings with ring are actually by Alexander-Roberts to fit Gibb sized sockets
I sourced them from Sailing Services in Miami
Hi Pedr,
Thanks for fielding that.
John,
(and other cutter savvy readers)
As always, a knock out interesting article that I have been pondering for some time that introduced new viewpoints that I had not considered before. For instance, the diagram that shows why the deck sweepers are such inefficient reaching sails because of the catch 22 of needing to move the sheet lead forward and aft at the same time…amazing!
I was wondering (probably along with other readers) about weather helm and tricks (sail trims) you use to reduce it on a cutter rig. We have a wonderful Brewer 12.8 with cutter rig, but I struggle to reduce weather helm when close reaching. Besides putting on some backstay tension, easing the vang a bit to allow the main to twist, and reefing the main, do you have cutter specific things you learned to help balance the boat?
Our jib is probably best described as high clewed genoa. It is a big sail, but the sheet angles are similar to that of a yankee, with the leads close to the center cockpit.
Thanks in advance. You the man!
Conor
Hi Conor,
Thanks for the kind comments.
First off, have you read the above chapter (I moved your comment)? Lot’s of tips that will help.
It’s really hard to diagnose a weather helm problem without sailing on the boat, but here are a few places to look:
Hi John,
Great article and comments. It’s amazing how little information is available about cutter rigs. I was pleased to see a picture of Mai Tai in the beginning of this article representing the cutter family. I do want to mention something that may be worth a look:
Cutter rigs have two sets of spreaders on the mast to give side or lateral support to the rig at the point where the “inner forestay” attaches. The second or higher set of spreaders is where the inner forestay should attach. If there is only one set of spreaders you will have to attach the inner forestay at such a low point that the staysail area will be reduced beyond effectiveness. Running back stays should be used to prevent fore and aft pumping of the rig but they will not provide enough lateral stability to hold the mast straight when flying the staysail. So there is more to converting a sloop to a cutter than first meets the eye. Intermediate shrouds need to be added and a second set of spreaders. This means chain plates in the hull, more wire rigging, turnbuckles and two more spreaders. Personally, I would buy a cutter to begin with and forget the conversion.
Cheers from New Zealand
Lane and Kay Finley
Hi Lane,
Welcome back! Even though you have just pointed out a glaring omission on my part…thanks…I think. :-).
Seriously, a very good point, although not a killer these days when so many boats have two spreader rigs.
Dear John,
I have a Pan Oceanic 46 cutter designed by Ted Brewer and I am in the process of making a new set of sails for my Genoa and staysail with Lee Sails in Hong Kong. I do not have much experience sailing cutter when I bought her (SV Sunrise), her set of sails were too old (and baggy) for me to make any deductions of what to ask for in my new set of sails. I have read your post on how the 2 sails should work together and will certainly discuss that with Lee Sails. However, I do have one observation that I am not sure if it is worth pursuing to improve upon; Sunrise does not go to close haul well. The best angle with the set of baggy sails is 45 degrees with about 18-20 degrees of heel. I mentioned that I am not sure if it is worth pursuing is because many opinions I got from the internet indicates that (1) cutter are generally not designed to sail close haul as a major consideration and (2) a semi-full keel are likewise not designed for close haul. But then again, there are opposing comments (to some degree) to the above. Hence I am exploring maximizing Sunrise’s close haul ability to sail as close to the wind as much as possible with a new set of sail since I am replacing them anyway. Your views and of others sailors are very much appreciated.
One other thing I notice is that the clew on SV Morganscloud is high compare to a conventional Genoa. It is more like a high cut Yankee. I thought that it is best aerodynamicall for the clew to be as low as possible (ie decksweeper) to maximize efficiency (less spillage at the foot and low centre of pressure of the Genoa equals less heel). The clew is raised on a cruising boat to allow forward view when sailing which is owner dependent. What may be your reason for a high cut Yankee as oppose to a conventional Genoa?
Please direct me to the correct page in your website if these topics have already been discussed as I cannot seem to find them on the search engine. Thanks much,
Hi Rob,
A full read through of this chapter and the last will answer the low cut genoa issue (don’t do it). A few other thoughts.
Hi John, have read the chapters. Very informative and addictive read. I should get back to work really! Ok, while preparing for the long cruising voyage (could be 4 to 7 years time) we as a family have to do with coastal sailing on our blue water cruiser. Many times the wind is on our nose and how i wish Sunrise could point higher and get there a little faster. Hence my exploration to increase the close haul performance. I can see the benefits of a true cutter for a short handed crew (basically, only my wife and I as our toddlers are a liabilities) and when the time comes for more reaching and downwind sailing arrives, I am really thinking how one can improve the upwind performance of a cutter rigged cruiser. Well, it gets worse. When we bought Sunrise, she came with a behind the mast roller furling main (Famet system which is now defunct). I know that is a very inefficient sail but a lot our sister boat owners advise against getting rid of it because of the ease of handling the main from the cockpit because the main is a big sail to hoist and handle on the conventional system. I have done some research and think that the Antal system is the way to go. But the system is expensive and I dont have the budget for it right now (including new gooseneck, reefing system etc). So I am “putting up” with the furling main until the kitty is more full but my wife thinks that I shouldnt for a short handed boat. Anyway, that is for another day. Meanwhile, I just play with the sails..
Rob: For what it’s worth, I have a steel full keel cutter with a largish staysail and a Yankee cut jib on a shortish bowsprit. I concur that 45 degrees is not unreasonable, but you can experiment with stay tensioning and certain techniques, such as backwinding the jib, to make your tacks more efficient, if not much higher. Tuning’s a bit of an art, but one well worth learning, in my view.
I just installed a Tides Marine track, full batten cars and “slippery” slugs on our new main and so far we are very pleased with the sail handling. The cost was about $1,000 for the gear, which was about 25% of the cost of the new main. You may wish to stick with the old main until you’re ready to commit. Were it me, I would change things up all at once.
BTW, how high does Morganscloud sail upwind to as a true cutter?
Hi Rob,
There’s no simple answer to that, depends on leeway, sea state and wind strength. In any sort of sea we make good about 50 degrees to the true wind angle, but at least 4 degrees of that is leeway due to our comparatively shallow draft and nothing to do with the cutter rig.
A good thing to remember when discussing close windedness is that most people lie about it, or at least are mixed up about true and apparent wind angles, or forget leeway. Almost no cruising boat, and few cruiser racers, actually make good even 45 degrees true wind angle unless the water is dead smooth. Also true and apparent wind angles on sailing instruments are almost never accurate.
Lest you thing that 50 degrees is a bad number, as the forum denizens will tell you, I need to point out that we are talking about a two time class winner of the Newport Bermuda race here.
As I say in the posts, a sloop with a low cut genoa will have better VMG in smooth water inshore. In the ocean over a multi day passage a properly tuned and sailed cutter will kick ass and take names, particularly if both boats are short handed. The key to fast ocean cruising rig is not close windedness (within reason) it’s all around speed—it’s not how fast you go that counts, it’s how often you go fast.
Even inshore, a bit of tactics counts for a lot more than 5 degrees of pointing: https://www.morganscloud.com/2010/11/04/racing-to-cruise/
Finally, there’s a simple cure for leeway and pointing too: 1200 rpm on the engine.
Hi Marc, Thanks for the advice. You boat sounds a bit like my boat except for the sails which I am about to make a decision on. I have not ventured to rig tuning yet but will do once the new sails are on. I have never heard of Tide Marine but I will check it out. The Antal system I looked at for a 46ft boat is in the region of $4000 excluding the sail!
Antal (and Harken) make fine products and on a different boat I would be happy to have them. The Tides Marine external track (which one measures with the special kit they send first) is sturdy and allows full battens and smooth dousings. It was a compromise but as we were getting an ocean-grade main, it was a logical one. Be prepared to grind your slug gate a little larger, however, should you choose to go this route. You may find this and the links off it instructive: http://alchemy2009.blogspot.ca/2016/05/sticking-around.html
Lastly, if you are tuning in earnest for the first time, remember to check and snug up your chain plate bolts first and to take it easy and to get a racing sailor aboard to help. Employ rum if needed.
Hi Rob,
I think your boat may be a bit big for the Tides system. A good mainsail slide system is a true blessing. Might be better to save up for a good one than cheap out.
Hi John, yes you are right. We close haul at 45 degrees to apparent wind. The one that is indicated on the Raymarine dial. Our system isnt wired (yet) to indicate True wind to us. Therefore we use the apparent wind angle as an indicator because when the boat moves, it is the wind angle that she sees. About Sailmaker. I live in Singapore and we do not have a local sailmaker here as the sailing community is not big enough. Lots of powerboats. Lee Sail in Hong Kong is just about the nearest and I was about to make a decision on a lowish cut Genoa until I read your posts. Our boat was designed as a true cutter and at one time i wanted to convert her to a full sloop for better upwind sailing. I am now doing a lot of rethinking and rereading your posts…
I have a low-cut genoa for strictly light air, but the standard sail is a high-cut Yankee. It is very versatile and only starts to get useless when 50% rolled up or so. The staysail can, if desired, have a set of reef points put it for truly hairy conditions. Some prefer both jib and staysail to be on furlers; I prefer the bulletproof (to me) hank-on staysail and storm staysail. With these two, we can run off in 50 knots. The trick to loving a cutter is to sail it in all weathers. Then you learn its qualities and forget stuff like the big old tacks you have to make.
Hi Rob,
OK, I see why you are so worried about this. 45 degrees to the apparent wind will equate to around a 120 degree tacking angle, and that’s pretty bad. First step, is, as you have determined, new sails. That and decent tuning should get you at least a 20 degree improvement in tacking angle which will be a huge improvement in VMG.
Good spotting, John. I thought he meant 45 degrees either side of the true wind, meaning a 90 degree tack, or close reach to close reach, I suppose.
Hi Marc and John, thanks for the advice. Will discuss Yankee jib and a low cut staysail with my sail maker and see what they come up with…
Hi John, I am working on my new sail in earnest. Can you explain what do you mean by ” the staysail stay should be parallel to the headstay and set about 30% of the foretriangle base (J) back from the headstay.” My boat’s main sail is a behind the mast roller furling sail with batten and has a straight leech. I know it is not an efficient sail but offer the convenience not getting out of the cockpit on a shorthanded boat. On its own, it does not give much forward speed to the boat. Say for a 10 knot wind, the boat moves only 3 knots (assuming no current). The genoa was the main driving force. Now, if I were to go for a Yankee jib and staysail combo, how do I get them right to compensate for an inefficient main. Bigger sail area?
Hi Rob,
I explain all of that in the three chapters on cutters.
Hi John, ok, thanks. Rob
Hi John, I am about to make a purchase of my Yankee jib and staysail. For the staysail Sail maker recommended a 9.4oz cross cut furling Dacron (10.76m luff x 3.9m foot x 9.6m leech). I think that should be ok as it is not a very big sail. The Yankee is a bit tricky because I am deciding on the cut and material. Sail maker recommends a 8.8oz cross cut furling Dacron (15.45m luff x 7.6m foot x 12.09m leech) or a tri-radial cut 9.1oz USwt Challenge Warp Drive dacron(WD9.11). The tri-radial cut is 50% more expensive than the cross cut option. I know you mentioned that the tri-radial cut is the way to go but my reservation is on the material (which I have not heard of anyone who has used it before) and a first timer converting to a true cutter sail plan and of course the cost. How much different in sailing performance is there between the cross cut and tri radial cut?
Hi Rob,
When I make a recommendation in a chapter like this I have thought about it a lot and it’s my recommendation. It would only change in light of new technology. I don’t believe this to be the case here.
My understanding is that the differences in cut distribute the sailing forces differently across the sail. The weight and strength of the material (is “Warp Drive” equivalent to “HydraNet”, which is Dacron beefed up with Ultra-PE?) is a separate metric. I went with a fairly robust weight of regular Dacron for my new main because of my reefing habits; my cutter’s Yankee is also stock Dacron, but were I to replace it, I would opt for a tri-radial cut as I suspect you can reduce stretch and bag over time. Me, I prefer a lighter cloth for the Yankee and an earlier furl.
If you don’t have money for the more expensive sail, moderation of your sailing habits to more conservatism is the cost of keeping the sail an equal number of miles at sea, I would think.
Hi Rob,
I have a bit more time today. I have no experience with warp drive, but I can say that laminates are now pretty reliable, so I would not worry too much about that. Also, it’s important to realize that with sails, like many things, initial cost and cost of ownership are two different things. So, while a crosscut woven Dacron sail may seem cheeper I have often found that a radial cut laminate sail keeps it’s shape so much better that in the end it can be a more economical choice.
In addition you will have more fun sailing your boat with a better sail.
Bottom line, cross cut is simply wrong for high cut jibs. In fact, even back in the day when I was sailmaking, long before radial cut headsails, we used to miter cut high cut sails for just this reason.
Hi Marc, very sound advice. Yes, I must admit that money is not on my side with so many things to do on the boat plus a family. I would like to go for a Dacron tri-radial cut but my sail maker does not do a Tri-radial cut with the standard Dacron. He would use laminates of Wrap Drive. But there is so little that can be found on Wrap Drive on the internet. Is it as good as the Hydranet? (my sailmaker does not use Hydranet, only Challenger material I think). So, is Wrap Drive worth the 50% increase in price? Not a question to you but to myself. But I appreciate the spirit of your honest sharing. Cheers mate,
Hi John, interesting that you mention that laminates are “pretty reliable”. All the feedback I got is to steer clear from it as it has a life of at most 5 years plus all the problems with mild dew. The only sailors I know who uses them are racers. In fact I do not know of any cruiser who uses laminates. Most use standard Dacron and Hydranet. Wrap Drive is not a laminate but Dacron with “wrap yarn” (whatever that is) to perform like laminate. I am uncertain of the maintenance requirements/issues, ease to repair and durability of the material to really make an informed decision. I think it is too new in the market. And yes, point taken on the tri-radial cut for a Yankee.
Leech line. most times it is difficult to reach the clew to adjust it while sailing. How does one do it on a Yankee which has an even higher clew. A friend of mine suggested using “over the Head” leech line where the lines goes over the head of the sail, comes along the luff to the (near) tack. It has a small block at the head to facilitate the acute turn of the leech line at the head. Have you had any experience or comments on this system of leech line?
Hi Rob,
As I said, I have no experience of Warp Drive, but after having a quick look it looks like a competitor to Hydra Net. Anyway, you have my opinions. Be aware that most forum denizens just repeat mythes, so making buying decisions based on “accepted wisdom” on a forum often leads to tears. Before Hydra Net was available, I used laminates for cruising and racing for years and had good service. If you are cruising full time, 5 years can be good, not poor service, it all depends on the miles. I generally find that a well made set of radial cut sails will last about 30,000 miles before losing their shape to the point I can no longer stand to sail with them.
And yes, leading the leach over the head is the required for a high cut sail, and something that any decent sailmaker should do as the default.
Hi Marc, this is from Curisersforum : “Warp is pretty much a marketing play to get you to pay 40% extra for a dacron sail. It’s still simply a woven dacron cloth and it will stretch on the bias just like any other (good tight weave) dacron cloth. In no-way will it perform (low stretch) like a laminate cloth.
There have been numerous attempts to make a woven dacron that is strong in one direction into good sails and they have all failed. Using Pentex fibers (a high modulus dacron) in one direction was all the marketing a rage a while ago. However, ALL woven cloth will stretch on the bias (that is at 45 degrees across the weave) no matter how low stretch the fibers or un-crimped the weave is. This is just a simple fact of the physics of weaving. And this is true if its cross cut or tri-radial. These attemps have tended to produce sails with shorter longivity than regular dacron cross-cut (because they try to use the low stretch in one direction and overload the bias direction).”
I guess the best advice is from someone who has actually used it.
Hi John, Thank you for taking the time to read into Wrap Drive. I really didnt expect you to as you already have a lot on your plate looking after your website. I was hoping perhaps some sailors in this discussion would have some experience. I am taking your opinions and advice thus far very favourably and seriously. Cheers,
Hi John, sunstrip protection for sails. Do you have any experience of using Challenge UV150 and Sunbrella as sunstrip for the Yankee and staysail? Of course in terms of performance, it is preferred not to have any sunstrip at all as it leaves the trailing edge of the sail relatively smooth. But in the tropics, some protection is needed. There is another option of using a laced up “sock”. But that needs another halyard plus more fabric to stow… And advice would be most appreciated. Thanks,
Hi Rob,
I don’t like Sunbrella for a sunstrip; too heavy so it distorts sail shape. Our sailmaker uses a self-adhesive product that works well and adds very little weight. I’m not sure what the product name is, but your sailmaker should know.
I am refitting a 1990 Cabo Rico 34 cutter with new sails and have been advised by my sailmaker that a 135 jib top “will give her more power up wind” whereas my internet research into the few other CR34 cutters that I could find shows those boats have anywhere from 110s to 130s for the jib top. Do you have an opinion on the 135 versus a smaller sail? And radial versus cross cut? I am also converting the staysail from hanked on to roller furling and dispensing with the boom. Any reason to consider retaining the boom as opposed to free footing the staysail? Of course I want to retain good self tacking ability as I single hand a lot. Thanks for a great website/resource.
Hi Keven,
If you are going to sail her as a true cutter using the Jib Top and staysail together any time the wind is forward of the beam, in my opinion, it would be a major mistake to build the jib top with that much overlap. I detail the reasons in these three chapters on the cutter rig. If you want more sail for light air performance buying a light air sail like a code 0 is almost always a much better solution than trying to add a bunch of area to the jib top.
Does your sailmaker clearly understand that you are planning to sail her as a true cutter with both headsails in use at the same time?
Hi John,
I plan to rig a Bristol 4.1 with cutter rig. I want to go with a yankee and staysail both set on roller curlers. My question is that I would like to make the clew higher on the staysail so that the lead would not need to be moved as the sail was eased. I do not really see the advantage of keeping the clew low to fill the space. The sail would still be pretty high with a significant gap that would limit any benefit from end plate. Regardless I would think the advantage of not needing to change the lead would out weight any end plate advantage.
Hi Mark,
If it were me, I would not do that and would, as I have, go to the trouble of installing good quality staysail sheet track. I think the reason a lower cut staysail works so well has nothing to do with end plate, but rather is to do with filling in the area under the high cut jib-top. Also, the other advantage of tracks is that they make heaving-to under a heavily reefed staysail practical. More here: https://www.morganscloud.com/2013/06/01/how-to-heave-to-in-a-sailboat/
Thanks John,
Your site is great. I was already convince of the benefits of the cutter rig but your site has convinced me that putting both staysail and Yankee on roller furling is a good idea. I will go with a deep 3rd reef in main. I will carry a trysail with separate track and a storm staysail. Based on what you and others have said these will really be back ups.
You say the benefit is of the low clew on the staysail is not end plate but filling the area. I respectfully ask how you come to that conclusion. Have you sailed boats both ways? Also you say another advantage of the sheet tracks for the staysail is that is allow you to deeply reef the staysail when heaving to. Would that also be possible with a high clew so that the lead would stay acceptable just like when the yankee is roller up?
I have chosen to retain a hanked-on staysail for simplicity’s stake, personally, and because my staysail’s stay terminates inside a foredeck anchor well and is a well-protected spot compared to a bare deck. Something you may not have considered is a reefable staysail. I have the yankee topsail jib you mention, but my staysail is relatively large. My choice for “big air” therefore, if I wish to proceed under sail, is to switch to a storm staysail, which I have, or to reef down. It’s not a difficult thing to arrange, but it isn’t always seen. A trysail and track for me is an added cost and complication as opposed to a deep reef or even a bare pole. It would be different had I not a pilothouse. People like the Pardeys favoured the cutter and had two reef rows on their low-clewed staysail: http://www.offcenterharbor.com/2015/01/15/favorite-sailing-rig-cutter-lin-larry-pardey/
Hi Mark,
I really can’t prove this for you, and I doubt anyone could without building two sails and doing in depth testing. What I can say is that the cutter rig has been perfected over decades using a lower cut staysail. That included the 1950-1980 when the cutter rig was very big in racing, particularly in the UK, so given that I’m pretty comfortable with my assertion.
Also, I have won our class twice in the Newport Bermuda race rigged this way, which seems to say it’s pretty efficient.
And yes, if you cut the staysail high enough you might be able to heave-to with a rolled sail without tracks, although I don’t think it would be as good or flexible as having tracks.
Bottom line, given the evidence and my experience, I would not go with a high cut staysail, but if you want to spend your money to experiment, that’s your call. One thought though, if it does not work, I suspect a recut of the sail will be impossible.
Hi John,
The reason your information is so good is the amount of experience you have. I am probably inclined to go with the low clewed tried and true way. I did not have any doubt that the low clew was at least a little bit more efficient. I just thought the not having the tracks and being able to roll better might be overall better from a cruising standpoint. Laziness was also a factor in that the boat does not have cabin top tracks.
Hi Mark,
Yes, these things are hard. As you say, I have the experience, but on the other hand that makes me potentially vulnerable to the “we have always done it that way” syndrome. In this case I’m pretty sure you will be happier going low cut, but as I said before, without a full comparison test, no one knows for certain.
I did think of one other advantage of tracks and that is that it’s near impossible for a sailmaker to built a sail to sheet optimally to a fixed point fore and aft, and also the optimal point tends to change as the sail ages.
Hi Mark,
A low(er)-cost, low-tech alternative to sheet track is a barber-hauler, can also be combined with something called (I think) a “twizzle”. One pulls the sheet lead to the centre line, the other pulls it down.
Regards,
Bill
Hi Bill,
I agree, that said, I would not like to see that kind of arrangement on a sail used in heavy weather because of all the associated gear that would be thrashing about and the complications.
Bottom line, staysail tracks work great in a whole bunch of ways, so they remain my recommendation.
John,
We are just able to start sailing our boat since extensive and ongoing refit and our recent rerig. Our boat did not come with staysail tracks on the coach roof like on yours but our main track on deck just about bumps against the aft lower chainplate. Our boat is a cutter from birth but I’m not exactly sure how to run the sheets(although from another post I commented, I believe our yankee is not a correct sail for the boat). In the boat’s brochure pictures, the yankee sheets are run to a snatch block on the toerail to the aft smaller winch while the staysail sheets are run to the deck track with car all the way forward and led to the big primary winches. Is this winch setup similar on Morgan’s Cloud? The more I think about it, the more I think I’ll have to put in another track. Honestly, I’m ready to just go sailing south and tackle that later… I’m not against a new track but I just know boats are different.
Can you shed some advice on the sheet winches and possibly sheet runs? I’d try to contact the designer but he’s hard to get a hold of and John Krestchmer would be a second choice but he’s voyaging at the moment. Any advice would be greatly appreciated, we’re new to cutters but I’m not sailing, I have raced can races and regattas for almost a decade.
To view the brochure click below. (it’s John’s scan, the broker that sold me the boat was a scum ball and didn’t include our original mint one)
http://www.yayablues.com/documents/quetzal_brochure.pdf
John. We are newbies to your site. Great stuff!! So…
We just purchased a 1990 Morgan 44- nelson merek, catalina built. She is a sloop and we want to add the inner forstay primarily for hoving to… spoke with a rigger, and he thought we should runner inner stay (dbl spreader rig) to upper spreader, and then down to about 2′ aft of forestay. More like a solent rig. We would according to him, not require running stays. We are looking to movr aboard and sail maine-florida for couple yrs then more extensive ocean sailing. Any thoughts?
Thanks
Hi Hal,
Welcome here and thanks for joining. Here are my thoughts:
Running the inner forestay to the upper spreader is certainly a good way to go.
As to a Solant type rig or a true cutter, both are good options but, in my opinion, for short handed offshore cruising the true cutter is the better and more flexible of the two for the reasons I have detailed in these three chapters.
As to dispensing with the runners, that’s a really bad idea. and to be frank calls the riggers competence to advise you into question. What you would be doing is placing a huge forward bending force from the new inner forestay, which will be used in heavy weather, without any counter force from runners to counteract this. Not a good plan.
John, great article about the cutter rig, so much really useful information here! We’ve just added a roller furler onto our inner forestay for our 100% staysail and want to start sailing our Tayana 47 as a cutter. So, the 138% genoa has to go. As you suggest, I’m working with a very reputable local sailmaker here in Maine. I note that you advise a high clew and I plan to specify that, and you also advise against trying to have a jib with too much overlap but how much do you think is OK? My thought is that if I get a radial cut jib with a high clew, if I get it as big as 115% for light air use, it should still have pretty decent shape furled to the 80% to 90% range. Do you think it would be OK to get a 115% high clewed radial cut jib, or is that too much overlap for a boat that is to be sailed as a cutter?
Hi Jeff,
There are a lot of variables here, but unless the boat is really under-canvased I would stick with 100% for the jib top. Keep in mind that beating and reaching with both headsails you will have as much or more area as you did with the 138%. Of course broad reaching and running you will have less but in those cases overlap area is really not that useful anyway since you can’t use it running unless you have an over-length pole.
Or to look at it another way, the only way to sail well off the wind in light air is to use a much larger sail like a spinnaker or code 0 type
In summary, overlap sail area is not really that useful. In fact I think the only reason so many boats have large overlapping headsails is because older rating rules encouraged them and we have never got out of the habit. Just look at modern racing boats to see the trend away from overlapping headsails.
Good day John,
I plan to upgrade my current cutter rig Tashing Baba40. Reading you advises always have been paramount in all the refurbishment I made during those last five years. This summer I intend to add a furling system to her staysail (and removing current hanks to that sail luff). This will make all current rigging on my boat similar to Morgan’s Cloud. I intend to sail alone (hopefully offshore in 2019) or with some company that would be inexperience in sailing. I don’t have much experience either but rather inform (from lots of reading and for having followed the ASA courses), thus De Facto making me feel ready to go offshore carefully…
Seating now with this background, here is my question. I like browsing sailboat for sale to get acquainted with nowadays equipment and how it is layout on their boat. Recently, Gozzard Yachts boat builder website (Gozzard.com) drew my attention on their cutter rig boats (of any size). They install just forward of the mast (and this as part of their basic rigging), a traveller style rig (called ”Curve Spatial Track) for which they claim handling the staysail when tacking while short handed sailing.
I feels this system is better than any staysail boom rig and really solves the tacking problem while short handed. Yes as drawback, there is no sheet cars for trimming your staysail as parallel to the jib sail as it should be.
Would you please comment the good and bad things you would foreseen or know on this system?
Looking forward to solve my staysail upgrade!
Cheers
Mag
Hi Mag,
I would not bother with any type of self tacking arrangement for the staysail, boom or track. Just too much complication, clutter, and expense, for very limited benefit. Even on our boat, which would have about twice the loads of the Baba, we can tack the staysail easily single handed just using winches for the last few inches.
Hi John,
We purchased a Westsail 39 earlier this year. It was originally designed as a cutter. The previous owner converted to a 135% genoa and added a solent stay with a 95% sail on a Hoyt boom. The cutter stay is still there terminated at the granny bars along with the running backs. The boat also came with nearly new high-clew jib and a staysail. Needless to say it is a very crowded rig.
I’m planning on removing the solent stay and boom. After a summer of climbing around that boom brought me fully on to your side of the hate-the-boom camp. I was suggested to me to keep the genoa because the boat is too small to efficiently fly a cutter rig for trade wind sailing. What are your thoughts on boat size vs rig type.
Hi Kevin,
If it were me, I would lose the boom and solent too, and rig as a cutter.
Maybe good to keep the 135% but if the cutter rig is set up right I doubt you will ever use it since the Jib Top and Staysail will add up to the about the same area and downwind it will be too long on the LP for your pole. If you do need a bigger sail to get her moving in the light, and you will (or motor) since the rig is small for the weight of the boat, either an asymmetric spinnaker or a code sail will be the way to go, albeit expensive.
More on sail area here: https://www.morganscloud.com/2020/06/24/sail-area-overlap-multihulls-and-racing-rules/
Hi. This may not be the correct place for this question, but I struggle to find much description on the use of runners. I’m happy to move my question to a different place.
My boat is an OVNI, so not a true cutter, but a centerboarder with a staysail. However, I pretty much always have my inner forestay up so it’s ready to be used, and as I feel it stabilizes the mast a lot (plus a backup in case the forestay were to break). I usually use the running backstays too.
But could you (or anyone) advise on the use of runners, tightening of the inner forestay and the runners, and tightness-balancing between them? I am afraid of over-tightening, and inverting my mast, and because of that, I always have a bit of “inner-stay-induced-mast-bend”.
Do the leeward runner need to be slacked or “parked” on every tack, and do you need to tighten it before you tack/gybe, or can it wait til after? As someone said, explain it to me like I’m 5…
Kindly, Arne 🙂
Hi Arne,
You best bet to shed light on that is to read through the tuning chapters since you will need to understand how runners fit into the overall system: https://www.morganscloud.com/2018/05/27/rig-tuning-dock-tune-part-1/
Better yet, since you are clearly working on you rig, I would recommend a read through of the entire book: https://www.morganscloud.com/category/rigging-sails/book-sail-handling-rigging/
Thank you. I have already read through it all, but I will do it again (probably many times).
My inner forestay is a removable one, so I need to adjust it to tension every time I remove/replace it, but I can probably find a way to mark the correct tension on the adjustment mechanism. 🙂
Hi Arne,
Yes, you definitely need to find a way to put the internal headstay back as the same setting every time. It’s a critical setting to rig tune.
Thanks John for the True cutter series. I was already in the process of adding an inner forestay, but now I’m even more sold on my decision. However now, it’ll be a jib-top instead of a genoa. I did as you suggested and contacted 2 sail lofts. The first one was all in and the second did exactly as you described. Told me it was a waste of money and dangerous.
Cheers,
Hi David,
Thanks for sharing that.
Well at least that made sailmaker selection easy! I wonder how on earth anyone could suggest a cutter rig was more dangerous given that it reduces single sail area by a lot compared to a sloop with a genoa.
Out of interest, which sailmaker is all in?