I have long recommended against anchor swivels, to the point that I also recommend against the Ultra anchor (even though I like a lot of other things about it) because it pretty much requires the use of Ultra’s swivel, or at least a shackle the wrong way around.
Swivels have never looked right to me, at least when they are connected directly to the anchor shank, the way most people use them, because any off-axis load will place huge pry loads on the fastening pin and the cheeks it’s through—see photo at top of Tip.
Of course I got a lot of push back over the years from swivel lovers, and even the makers of the Ultra, and that’s fine, robust discussion is a lot of what makes AAC work.
In this case a lot of that disagreement was based on the advertised break loads of the Ultra Swivel. I get it. How could we not trust a really nice-looking piece of kit with a huge advertised break load; for example, the UFS16-100, at 53,200 lbf (2365 kN)?
But wait, that assumes a straight pull on the axis of the swivel. What about if the anchor can’t pivot to the load, due, for example, to being stuck in rocks or an obstruction? That’s the scenario I have always worried about in connection with swivels.
Well, now we have the answer: