© Attainable Adventure Cruising Ltd and the authors, all rights are reserved.
Nothing on this website or in direct communications received from us, or in our articles in the media, should be construed to mean or imply that offshore voyaging is anything other than potentially hazardous. Dangers such as, but not limited to, extreme weather, cold, ice, lack of help or assistance, gear failure, grounding, and falling overboard could injure or kill you and wreck your boat. Decisions such as, but not limited to, heading offshore, where you go, and how you equip your boat, are yours and yours alone. The information on this web site is based on what has worked for the authors in the past, but that does not mean it will work for you, or that it is the best, or even a good way for you to do things.
Hi John,
I’ve long thought that the majority of “drop-in” batteries should rather be named drop-out batteries. 🙂 As I see it, any lithium BMS, inside the battery or outside of it, that cannot communicate with the charging units is useless, just junk. Batteries or systems with such a BMS are proof that a swindle has happened.
Hi Stein,
I have to say I agree. It’s really sad that companies went for short term gain at the expense of their customers, and doubly sad because it’s put a taint on what is fundamentally a good technology: lithium batteries.
Are you sure? It says battery system not “the battery”. Doesn’t this mean a battery monitor installed that warns of temp, voltage, or current approaching an out of spec condition would meet this requirement?
Personally, I feel ABYC caved to drop-in manufacturers and really developed a weak and potentially dangerous standard.
Hi Ray,
I’m sure the companies that make drop in batteries that don’t communicate will claim that, but, I don’t agree.
The fact is that there is no way for an external monitor to predict the intentions of an internal BMS that does not communicate because there is no way for said monitor to know the state of charge of the battery unless the BMS tells it.
As to caving to the drop-in manufactures, take a look at who is on the committee that wrote the standard!
Let’s just say that my guess is the ambiguity in the sentence I quote was required to get any sort of standard approved.
The above E-13 verbiage says “should” not “shall”. I may not speak the queen’s english, but in my view communicating via alarm before disconnect is not expressly a requirement. Others in LiFePO4 groups I frequent on FB are of the same opinion. This is to say nothing of the value of such an alarm, I’m only speaking to the language.