© Attainable Adventure Cruising Ltd and the authors, all rights are reserved.
Nothing on this website or in direct communications received from us, or in our articles in the media, should be construed to mean or imply that offshore voyaging is anything other than potentially hazardous. Dangers such as, but not limited to, extreme weather, cold, ice, lack of help or assistance, gear failure, grounding, and falling overboard could injure or kill you and wreck your boat. Decisions such as, but not limited to, heading offshore, where you go, and how you equip your boat, are yours and yours alone. The information on this web site is based on what has worked for the authors in the past, but that does not mean it will work for you, or that it is the best, or even a good way for you to do things.
Hi John,
I do use Nautical Miles and knots at sea, of course, and I do agree that the reference to the longitude scale was useful on paper maps. However, I think my use is based on habits from that time, not really good reasons, since I must disagree with every other reason he mentions. Mentioning the absolutely useless furlongs, cables and more proves my point:
He seems to put value in tradition. I do too, but not for this type of topic. Measuring systems must only be chosen by performance, what is the most functional. So, Nautical Miles have one single link to paper maps, which is not really relevant for most people today. Metric misses this irrelevant benefit, but has the advantage of being intuitively understood by far more people, and being far simpler to learn. Those are arguably superior benefits.
His point seems even more related to a resistance to modernising, as he gives a rant about being coerced towards metric away from the imperial measurement system, which was annoying and useless even when it was developed, in medieval times. I can understand using it because of habits, which is why I’ll keep using Nautical Miles and a 360 degree compass. Still, I don’t think functionality and the future is on my side there…
Hi Stein,
I agree that he sounds a bit old fashioned and curmudgeonly. That said, I disagree with you that nautical miles are only useful on paper charts. To me the link between nautical miles and latitude is fundamental to all navigation, and must be understood to be a safe navigator. I do agree that furlongs are useless, but I use cables all the time and find them useful because I can easily visualize one and then relate that back to the speed of the boat: at 6 knots it takes 1 minute to travel a cable and 10 to travel a nautical mile. That said, it’s fine with me if people prefer to say “a tenth of a mile”.
In summary, the key point here is that the nautical mile relates to the real world, the km does not.
All that said, I’m a huge fan of the metric system for all other things and wish our friends to the south would get with the program so we in Canada could finally get rid of imperial.
Knowing simple relationships between systems can help, for as long as we’re likely to be exposed to both. For instance, wind speed in m/s can be doubled to get knots (rounded). This has helped me many times, as I’m still thinking knots, while weather forecasts give me m/s.
Hi Frode,
Good tip, I do exactly the same.