© Attainable Adventure Cruising Ltd and the authors, all rights are reserved.
Nothing on this website or in direct communications received from us, or in our articles in the media, should be construed to mean or imply that offshore voyaging is anything other than potentially hazardous. Dangers such as, but not limited to, extreme weather, cold, ice, lack of help or assistance, gear failure, grounding, and falling overboard could injure or kill you and wreck your boat. Decisions such as, but not limited to, heading offshore, where you go, and how you equip your boat, are yours and yours alone. The information on this web site is based on what has worked for the authors in the past, but that does not mean it will work for you, or that it is the best, or even a good way for you to do things.
I have no recommendations to offer, unfortunately – my rudder repair/replacement is still on the to-do list. But I do have a question to resident engineers: why doesn’t anyone talk about replacing internal rudder structure (or chainplates, for that matter) with super duplex steel, instead of 316? I’ve heard that super duplex grades are much more resistant to corrosion in marine environment, but the lack of the discussion of them makes me worried that I’m missing something.
Hi Alex,
As you say, I think that’s one for the engineers in that I don’t have a clue. That said, if it were me, I would stick with whatever the rudder builder was used to using. In my experience insisting that on a change to something not often used can have unintended consequences and that risk tends to outweigh possible benefits. The other thought is that if you really want to up the quality of the rudder (and spend more money) a carbon shaft is, I think, the way to go since it solves the problem of leaking into the rudder. See Matt’s article in further reading.
Hi John,
Well, as you correctly suggest in the article, a carbon rudder is way overkill for my old boat and would be a waste of money. I wonder about SD steels, because the cost is nearly the same as 316, which is not true of carbon or titanium. And they have the promise of reduced worries about crevice corrosion and stress corrosion cracking. I recently received exactly the same quote for chainplates made of electropolished 316L or super duplex steel.
The rudder on my boat has bronze stock and plates. I have to consider alternatives, as bronze is quite pricey here in Europe.
I have yet to drill into the rudder and so don’t know its condition yet. Maybe I’ve won a lottery and won’t need to replace the rudder. Who knows? But it pays to consider my options beforehand.
Cheers,
Alex
Hi Alex,
I agree on carbon, I was just pointing out that if one is going to mess with what the rudder builder normally does (always a risk) then might as well go the whole hog to Carbon. Otherwise I would stick with the standard Foss rudder (or Jefa if you can get them to engage).
The big danger of insisting on a change to standard spec is that if anything goes wrong, say they screw up the welding because they were not familiar with the material, they can then say “sorry, you insisted on that material, it’s all on you”.
Hi John
My thought about carbon rudder stocks for cruising boats—- If the designer/engineer has designed enough of them to fully understand what he is doing he will have been designing for race boats and will be firmly embedded in the weight saving mentality. He needs to double or triple his scantling calculations in order to design a shaft that won’t break under any conditions!
Hi Richard,
I agree that one would definitely want to make it stronger than a racing rudder, that said, I think it might not be a good idea to make the shaft too strong. I would rather lose a rudder than have a super strong rudder shaft tear the entire bearing carrying tube out of the boat leaving a huge gaping hole.
Hi John
A few weeks ago in reply to Colin’s thought that building rudders out of wood would be too expensive I outlined how I would approach building from wood in a production situation. As I learn from your article how best-in-class companies like Foss (Florida) build their fiberglass rudders I’m starting to believe that my CNC wood manufacturing procedure may even be superior:
This manufacturing process is proven in millions of stress tests and is standard practice in the construction of alpine skis.
1- Western Red Cedar @ 23.7 # per CU’ imposes no weight penalty vs 20# density foam. The overall product may indeed be lighter because the exterior fiberglass shell doesn’t have to be thick enough to withstand foam expansion pressures.
2- CNC milling of the two Cedar rudder halves allows me to create two precision O-ring grooves in the rudder shells. During assembly two O-rings will be slid over the shaft and compressed. Far superior to leaving a gap and hopefully filling it with 3M 5200. (Which has a good but ultimately limited underwater life span)
3- Foss needs to have hundreds of rigid molds in order to build all of the rudders they have produced over the years. If they are stored according to standard boat yard practice, they will have become less than fair in the sun and weather. I can store the precision digitized dimensions for every rudder in the world on one disk or memory stick. A single CNC milling machine can build hundreds of different designs, every one more precise than any molded fiberglass rudder. .
4- Western Red Cedar is extremely rot resistant, although not impervious like high density foam. However the rough blanks are epoxy laminated from 3/4″ stock, creating a water barrier at each seam should any water enter the rudder.
5- One of the faults of standard fiberglass rudder construction is that the internal metal bits are asked to transfer the rotational loads to low density foam or imprecise contact with the exterior skins. In my procedure the rotational loads are all carried to the wood by high density epoxy/silica filler in the remaining small gaps between the bulkheads or paddles and the CNC milled recesses in the wood.
6- In my procedure I do not have to rely upon blind pouring and expansion of foam for QC. Each half is precision indexed to the opposite, and final assembly is accomplished with a hydraulic press just like HEAD used when they built my downhill race skis.
WOOD IS GOOD!
Hi Richard,
All sounds good. I’m a huge fan of building such things from Western Red Cedar having built centreboards and rudders out of the material back in the day for my 505s. Incredible strength to weight ratio. That said, I would very much doubt anyone will ever actually do this because of the set up costs and quite small market. The other problems would be marketing: convincing people to go that route and competing with the Foss and Jefa.
Hi Richard,
I really like the concept you’ve outlined for using CNC machining to build a wood composite rudder. The compressed seals at the shaft entry, the positive structural connection of the internal armature to the shell, plus friendlier materials to work with for at least part of the process are all advantages, to my mind. The equipment needed is also highly flexible for other types of woodworking.
A further advantage might be greater ease of engineering and fabricating a breakaway section for the lower portion of a spade rudder. Having bombproof continuous structure all the way to the end of a vulnerable cantilever doesn’t make a lot of sense to me, but unless I’m mistaken, seems to be the status quo for rudders. To my amateur engineering brain a breakaway section would be a relatively easy opportunity to help prevent a potentially catastrophic cascading failure mode. (Grounding = bent shaft / broken tube & flooding, loss of steering when off a lee shore, etc.)
All in all, perhaps there’s potential for a side business for someone who enjoys this type of fabrication and could successfully demonstrate & market the various benefits.
Hi John
Actually the set-up cost for my proposal would be far less than a company like Foss experiences. For every new rudder shape they have to build an expensive mold and then toss it out in the back yard until somebody comes along needing the same design. With CNC the manufacturer only needs to input the codes and can produce hundreds of different models from the same machine. I did ERP consultation for a small furniture manufacturer, and can testify that the CNC machine they employed was not particularly expensive.
On the other hand I am the last person in the world who would try to build a business that required convincing yachty customers that wood is a good engineering material—-.
Hi Richard,
Yes I can certainly see the benefits of CNC. In fact my friend Mark Lindsay did that years ago with an early and primitive versions to make 505 and FD rudders and boards much more efficiently than by hand, as we had been doing. Still as you say, the wood will be the killer. Always amazes me that yachties will embrace steel with all its issues and then walk away from epoxy saturated wood.
Hi Scott,
I like the idea of a breakaway section in theory but they can be a bit tricky in practice. The trouble is making something that doesn’t break away during hard but normal use but does break away before everything else is damaged. The issues are due to a few things:
– Fatigue: As an example, in steels and stainless steels, there is a fatigue limit where if you keep the stresses below that limit, you will never have fatigue issues. This is great but the limit is 1/3-1/2 of the normal yield stress depending on alloy so you need to oversize to account for this. Since the most likely material we are talking about here is fiberglass, it suffers from fatigue as well and has the added complication that it is much harder to predict analytically because it is very dependent on fiber orientation and type so rules of thumb like with steel are too simplistic. I don’t know enough to comment on fatigue in wood.
– Manufacturing variability: The way that fiberglass rudders are actually built is not super repeatable in terms of strength, it isn’t awful but it isn’t like machining billet steel. To really control this, you would need to have tight environmental controls, very tight resin ratio (prepreg?), precision cut and laid cloth, etc. If doing normal hand layups, because of the variability you need to add a decent safety factor to account for this variability. Of course, if we go to Richard’s idea, we can machine very precisely but wood is not very homogeneous so you have the same problems as fiberglass. Also, wood changes properties over time more than the other materials.
– Safety factor/poorly known loads: Above I suggested that you needed to account for fatigue but not including a safety factor to go along with this is pretty poor practice. When loads are really well known and you have a very consistent and predictable manufacturing process you can run quite low safety factors on top of allowances for things like fatigue but in this case, neither is true. As discussed above, manufacturing is not all that consistent. Maybe more importantly, loads are actually not that well known. Are you designing for a wild broach in 30′ waves? Has anyone ever instrumented a rudder in those conditions? Can you extrapolate data from one design and weather system to another? This doesn’t mean you can’t design for it, you just need to include a bigger safety factor to your expected loads.
When you combine all this stuff, it is easy to convince yourself that the breakaway section suddenly needs to have a static strength that is nominally 10X more than your max predicted load. Then to make sure that the right thing breaks, everything else must be much stronger than this. It absolutely can be done but the engineer doing it needs to do a proper tolerance analysis on the whole thing and I am not talking just dimensional tolerances, I am talking loads, layup strength, etc. It would be very easy to design only to nominal and find that the breakaway either fails to early or isn’t the thing that fails despite the analysis saying that it should work. To make a breakaway practical, you generally need to have the breakaway load be much higher than all other normal loads.
Eric
Hi Eric,
Thanks for clarifying that, I had no idea how complex the engineering was on that. Good to know.
Hi Alex,
I don’t have a great engineering answer for you on why one of the duplex grades is not used, maybe someone else does. Thinking about the required properties, I can’t think of why it wouldn’t work well. As you say, duplex does better than 316 in terms of corrosion and strength and machining and welding it are not significantly different. It has been a few years since I have spec’ed any duplex but in my experience, 2205 was more expensive than 316 so it is interesting to hear that you got similar quotes. One other thing to watch is ductility where duplex is usually not as good as many other grades. If I remember right, you can’t cold head it for example. Also, if the elongation at break is low, that is a decent proxy for low toughness which can also be measured in a standardized way (this is Foss’ concern with carbon fiber).
Looking at why this sort of thing happens is always interesting. To be perfectly honest, many mechanical engineers get a list of materials they are comfortable with and then stick to it, we can’t be experts in all materials, even materials engineers have certain areas they specialize in. For example, I design robots and our entire materials database has less than 30 materials in it for several hundred custom parts in each generation of machine and that includes all metals, plastics, etc. I added a new grade of PEEK the other day for a very specific application and it was met with some degree of resistance since we would need a new supplier, etc. There are a few reasons that we get away with a relatively short material list, the most important probably being that we often design for stiffness not strength and the variations in modulus of elasticity between different grades of the same family of materials such as stainless are low, you have to switch to aluminum or another family of materials to make a big difference. I am guessing that naval architects have even fewer materials that they reach for than engineers and when they get into really high end race boats, then you get a bunch of engineers involved. It may also be that many of them simply don’t understand the issues with stainless in some environments, learning the issues can actually be quite tricky. Also, duplex is only ~30 years old, it takes a while for a material like that to come into widespread usage, the first time I ran into was a very specialty casting application and it was a new material to both us and the casting vendor. Finally, most people designing stuff automatically put some cost consciousness into their design and then you can also have cost requirements coming from outside whether reasonable or not. None of this makes it right or wrong but it does explain why some perfectly good and maybe better materials are sometimes not used.
And then the question is also what other materials should we be looking at. Bronze like you have can be attractive although it has lower strength and can cost a lot. Titanium is always interesting to contemplate. At least 1 manufacturer tried fiberglass and discovered their implementation needed improvement. It may well be that there is not even 1 best material as it becomes design dependent with stress, deflection and other factors dictating the material requirements.
Eric
Thank you, Eric! That’s all great food for thought.
Hi Eric,
Thanks for fielding that, much appreciated as always.
I had the rudder on my ’74 Tartan 26 cease steering off near Monhegan in 1990. I was luckily able to bring the boat into Port Clyde by adjusting the sails to steer. There I found that Tartan no longer had plans for the boat. The first attempt to get to a haulout harbor resulted in having the rudder actually fall off (another story). To get the boat hauled miles up the coast in Rockland I had to fabricate a steering sweep out of a dock plank and lash it to the stern pulpit. I felt like a Viking, and it worked! I had the boat hauled and lowered the stock. I used my memory and the skeg to design a shape as close as possible to the original one. I had a a stock made up and had as tangs welded on. I then built a new rudder by laminating many layers of marine plywood around the stock and frame, fairing it with a grinder and sander. I poured thickened epoxy through the small inconsistencies in the layup around the stock. I sailed the boat for several years with no noticable performance issues. I eventually sold the boat to a young couple who sailed it down to the Virgin Islands and had no problems. The last I heard they had sold the boat to buy a larger one. Probably not perfect, but it worked for years. I now am very concerned with checking my rudder for cracks or signs of water ingress.
Hi Nick,
Your story, and Colin’s, brings up another important point I failed to point out: if we leave the rudder as it is on an old boat and it falls off completely the problem is far worse, and likely to be far more expensive, than if we replace the rudder before it’s lost. Thanks for the fill.
in 2013 i had a friend with a Catalina 33 having a lot of delamination and osmosis on his spade rudder. We looked at the options. I had the experience of building rudders on my boat and told him the cost by calculating the stringers required and the plate (11 Ga). Repairing a rudder on a boat with stainless steel is easy because 1) most of the time you have the rudder shaft in plain 316 2) the rudder is isolated from the electrical system of the boat. Or can easily be.
We templated the old rudder, found its original NACA profile and reproduced it. Took a day from 7h00am to 3pm at 2 guys. Stainless steel cost was 400 $. Welding furniture at 200$ A little bit of fairing was required 50 $. And a paint job. His rudder costed him about 800 CAD and was lighter than its fibercounterpart, stronger, impervious to water. I had sailed and raced since.
Interestingly, a rudder with all the mechanical constraint that it is subjected to, is a part where metallic construction have a lot of advantage and not so much weight challenge. Metallic rudder are hollow…they have positive buyoancy…
https://photos.google.com/u/0/photo/AF1QipNHa5EUVaWgfgmy3vftE6Gjdr9nxC8mUtosUuOD
https://photos.google.com/u/0/photo/AF1QipM3Xci_zv8SqVUIhzmpRCbFxLuZN4kvUiPW-54m
https://photos.google.com/u/0/photo/AF1QipPn9V4qClM8PQFb8HM5tNi_KN-1J0wUJTMr5Gm6
https://photos.google.com/u/0/photo/AF1QipNU6LyrSYkyPoIbk2DpOSgcxhBaSBnoWzCexNN9
https://photos.google.com/u/0/photo/AF1QipN7YLi6ByRV8ZQHVmtVKALtH49oe_13y8aY1-rP
Hi Andre,
After building a steel boat from scratch, you have great skills in the area. This is not route I would recommend for others. Also, I’m not a fan of SS below the waterline because of the stray current risks and the weird stuff that welded SS seems to be subject to in salt water. Far more care is required to keep the former under control than most fibreglass boat owners will want to know or practice. Particularly since the rudder may not in fact be isolated from the electrical system—yes it can be, but in practise it often won’t be, depends on the bonding system and other factors. And even some damp dirt in the wrong place, or a wire chafed through in the binnacle can change that.
The point being that a SS rudder is kind of like installing a saildrive in a fibreglass boat: you just bought a metal boat with all of the drawbacks and none of the benefits: https://www.morganscloud.com/2019/07/03/why-are-saildrives-even-a-thing/
Also I need to point out that the SS rudder would cost far more than $800 if labour was taken into account. Probably far more than just ordering a new rudder from Foss, and way more hassle for anyone who does not have your skills (most of us).
Hello John I agree its just an amateur-boatbuilding fantasy. Also you are right that SS should not be used underwater but in this specific case we knew the rudder stock was not bound to the ground. And please do not compare aluminum saildrives to stainless steel, these are not the same and agreed the number of parts of a saildrive make this a cocktail of dissimilar metal that should never exist.
3 boating friends out of 5 ( i don’t have many) owner of various size polyester boat have had to redo their rudders because of osmosis, impact or whatever in the last 10 years. Altough no boatbuilders, they tackled to do it in their garage just to save some money in the winter while there is nothing to do outside here in Canada. I HATE the smell of fiberglass resin but i have to admire these guys that agreed to spend several days chipping the rotten wood, balsa or whatever inside then replacing it with fitted new stock. Its is a 2 week job to redo a rotten polyester rudder.
We even had our local racing team with their Open 60 (Yes there are 2 Open 60 at our marina !!!!) had to redo the rudder because they hit a fish on their last St-Malo-Quebec race. Seems it is a regular maintenance chore on these boats. They did it in front of everyone at the marina… so this is not rocket science.
Lets correct my first saying that a replacement rudder could be made in normal steel (not stainless steel) plate welded to the SS rudder stock. NACA profile are public information and the transverse that give the NACA profile to the rudder can be laser cut for very cheap. Steel is about .50 $ per pound and once laser cut the cost is about .75$ per pound including the nesting process. Laser shop have huge leverage because they buy so much steel. I can guarantee you that any decent metal worker can do a single rudder in less than a day. Another day for preparing of the laser cutting. ( i carry the coordinates of my rudders in a .dwg file just i case i need to have them rebuilt)
Once protected by epoxy + barrier coat, there is no reason a rudder with two small anode cant do many decades of service.
Hi Andrea,
I was not saying that a saildrive is the same as a SS rudder, just that adding a lot of underwater metals to a fibreglass boat means that you then have the worst of both worlds, and I stick by that opinion. For this comparison the dissimilar metals in a saildrive are not relevant since I specifically said I was talking about stray current issues.
To me at least, putting a steel rudder on a fibreglass boat is a classic example of when your favourite tool is a hammer, everything starts to look like a nail.
For those who are just trying to get out there in the simplest and most efficient way possible, a fibreglass rudder made by Foss or Jefa is a much better idea than a custom job in a material with a whole new set of care requirement that they will have to learn.
You, of course, do not have to agree :-).
Love your sense of humor John, at least the readers now have an idea of what can be made in the span of available solutions, this one having some value in a survival situation (steel can be welded with 2 *12v battery) so if in their pursuit of adventure they broke their rudder on a remote island with not so much spatial material around, they could have it repaired.
To my opinion to put a stainless steel stick in a fiberglass kind of lolipop and dip in the water may also be running after trouble. The top join between the inflexible stainless steel rudder stock and the polyester is a sure place where water can enter, especially with temperature variation and gravity wanting everyting to go down.
Also, a good sea story: maybe to have all metal rudder would have saved the rudder of a friend on is Legend 45, caught in a squall between Gaspesie and Magdalen Islands with 8 sailing students onboard, they were battling the sudden 50 knots winds when they hear a “crack” and the boat lost steering. In the turmoil of the situation, the owner put his head under the lazarette searching for the cables and cardan, everything was there. But the boat non navigable. When the wind calmed down he put his head under water and the rudder has disappeared! They managed to came back to Magdalen island by hooking up the largest sail bag they had at their stern over a Y rope arrangement. When the boat was docked, he manage to remove the rudder stock; a massive 4 inch 316 shaft, just below the waterline it looked like a sharpened pencil…perfectly machined by some powerful lathe. That guy had friends at the Hydro Quebec research center and arranged to have the remaining of the rudder stock sent there. It appears upon analysis by the researchers at the center that only a “superbolt” of more than 100 Gigajoule could have vaporised a 4 inch stainless steel cylinder.
a true story, the guy still sail on his boat. Now he is not sure that it would be better to be hit on the mast than on the rudder…
Hi Andre,
Let’s leave it there shall we.
Just as a non-contentious data point, the guy I sold my ’73 Viking 33 sloop to in 2016 opted to have the original rudder, which we both knew was at its “end of life”, with a stainless steel replacement. The boat is in fresh water, and the owner is on a mooring well away from any potential electrical issues and so deems it an appropriate rebuild material. Time will no doubt tell if it is a mistake or not, but a year later, it steers the boat as well as the old one it replaces did, but without cracks and weeping. https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-FhpqcNtDkqM/XNl_LeGx52I/AAAAAAAAFRY/K6n7Sxsn7kU8Fj8OBmTk1t0OneMn7L6IgCLcBGAs/s640/20190424_181630.jpg
Reading the above, can anyone explain to me why there would be a problem with stray current on a stainless steal rudder but not on a Foss rudder with having a stainless steel shaft?
I mean, in both cases there is SS involved in direct contact with seawater.
Thanks
Hi Frans,
Yes, I see what you mean, and to a certain extent your are right. That said, a fully stainless steal rudder is made of thin plate and the history of welded stainless steal plate underwater is not good. The solid rod that rudder stocks are made of seems to be a lot more resistant to problems.
I’m in the middle of an engine refit (Beta 43) in my 1980 Fast Passage 39, and after reading the previous article on rudders decided to have a good look at mine. It was leaking rusty water, so decided it would be prudent to add a new rudder to the refit, since I was already on the hard.
I did some research on rudder manufacturers and found the two Foss plants (FL and CA), and received quotes from each. Jefa replied stating that they only made spade rudders. Mine is not a spade, so they were out of the running. My boat yard (The Boat Yard at Rocky Pointe Marina near Portland, OR) said they had heard of a rudder company in Idaho, so I reached out to ruddercraft.com and had a great conversation with Jeff Alexander. Total cost including shipping both ways was $3879.39 for a custom made rudder.
It came with one coat of Interlux 2000E barrier coat, so the yard put 4 more coats on and 2 coats of bottom paint. We’re lifting the boat tomorrow and installing it for a launch the following day.
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for the fill on ruddercraft.com. I just spent some time on their site. It seems like they are more a small boat rudder builder as well as tiller builder rather than a larger boat rudder specialist like Foss. May not be a problem, but that’s what jumped out at me. I could not find any even 40 foot boat rudder in their list. Also, there is nothing about their process on the site.
I recently spoke to ruddercraft and they don’t have original molds for many production boats.
While he sounded competent etc, the Foss Foam product was much less $$. The California plant and Florida plant split 25 years ago. Most production boat rudders ( I have 1983 Cal 35-2), especially ones from the left coast are made in Cal….
Hi Edward,
That was my conclusion too. You will find more on the split between the two Foss companies in Part 1.
For those inclined to rebuild their rudder DIY Mads @saillife on youtube did the complete job for an old Warrier 38, including new molds. It was quite a bit of trial and error. You will find some good documentation starting from here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IjN9Sgm2qs. After watching his work, you will either be solidly prepped for your own process, or maybe reconsider the merits of DIY.
The designer Dick Koopmans Sr. has a different approach to rudders on his aluminium centerboard yacht; both rudder and huge stock in alu, welded shut so no mix of different materials with all that entails. Rudder stock fully supported from below. Far from a racing design, but rock solid – literally.
Picture here
p.p.s
In the picture of the rudder, the notch at the top aft end of the rudder is made to fit and lock in place a piece of anchor chain. The use is for swinging the rudder sideways (steering) with ropes from the cockpit in the event of a steering gear failure. The bit of chain with two lengths of rope attached is thrown overboard and then pulled in place in case of need.
Hi Petter,
Yes, that’s one of the big advantages of metal boats: a rudder built of all one material so no water can get in. That said, I would never recommend an aluminium rudder or steel for a fibreglass boats for the reasons I put forward in my discussion with Andre.
As to DIY, the trial and error, as you point out, is the reason that I think most people will be better off just buying a rudder from Jefa or Foss.
Or to put it another way, as I’m often want to say to my self “John, just because you can do it, does not automatically make it a smart to do it”.
Hi John,
Thanks for the information on the cost of this, not money I would love to spend but definitely not unreasonable for what you are getting. I am at least glad that Foss exists and we have a decent option beyond DIY and going to the local yard who certainly won’t be specialists.
Eric
Hi Eric,
Yes, that’s the key point, isn’t it: the best of a crummy situation, at least for most of us, is a new rudder from Foss. I have to say that at the end of the work I did to research the two chapters I was quite relieved that the news was not worse.
I’m curious. What would be the difficulties of a transom hung rudder with a sugar scoop aft of the transom. The rudder could be balanced. The sugar scoop serving as an end plate decreasing risk of cavitation. Yes a forward strike could cause it to indent the sugar scoop preventing it from being able to steer. But the canoe body should remain intact with proper construction.
Currently have an Outbound 46 with a balanced spade. After seeing many boats where the rudder is keeping the skeg on not the other way around think whatever design you sail what’s most important is engineering, execution and maintenance.
Hi Lee,
There’s a lot to like about transom hung rudders. In fact that was most likely what we were going to go with for the A40. That said, there are drawbacks, one of which is it makes fitting a vane gear more difficult and it works best with a tiller, not a wheel.
Hi John
Just info, which you may already know. The Rustler 36 has a transom hung rudder. I bought mine with wheel steering (quadrant mounted in lazarette) but have converted to tiller; a very simple job. My Windpilot is mounted on a bracket with 4 arms, 2 each side of the rudder post and bolted through the transom. It worked/works well with both systems.
Yours aye
Bill
Hi Bill,
Sure, I know the issues with transom hung rudders are solvable, that’s why we considered it for the A40, I just wanted to point out that pretty much all alternatives have drawbacks.
Taking the wheel out of your boat makes a lot of sense to me.
Hi Alex,
Duplex stainless steel is roughly 2.5 x as strong as 316 and that makes it suitable for rudder stocks. It also has far better corrosion resistance as well as far better fatigue resistance.
Welding needs to be done with pulsed MIG so as not to put in too much heat which if cooled too quickly can lead to a phase change . This is when the mixture of 316 and hi tensile steel unravels to one or the other forms. This is rarely a problem but should be considered.
In using 25 kilometres of duplex welding wire we used a ferritescope to test for phase change and found none.
Next all metal rudders should be filled with oil. This is because no welds are indeed totally watertight but have tiny pin holes. We saw this in xrays and Lloyds welding rules specifically allow a % void .
A duplex rudder should be isolated as it is more active than most other metals.
While the potential is there for hydrogen embrittlement , which occurs in water temperatures over 26deg C it should not be a concern if replacing a 316 rudder stock with duplex of the same size.
No zinc anodes should be fixed to the rudder.
Hi William,
thanks for your input.
Hi John,
I am surprised that you don`t like the idea of a full 316 rudder but are happy to have a 316 stock. The main issue with 316 below the waterline is crevice corrossion which is where the 316 is denied oxygen. The worst affected area is just inside the rudder bearing tube.
So given that we already have those issues with the fibreglass rudders, why wouldn`t we take advantage of the benefits of a metal rudder which can be made up by any stainless fabricating shop for far less money.
It is simple to make as you also weld the horizontal tangs ,laser cut by the stainless supplier to the NACA shapes, to the stock.
The covering skin is then stitch welded to the frames and the stock ,and the opposite skin is stitch welded in laser cut slots. The edge is then welded closed.
I would certainly do this rather than buy an expensive Foss rudder.
Finally if I were building a Foss type rudder I would prime the stainless with International 820 primer as a lot of paints epoxies etc do not adhere to stainless very well.
The finished rudder after fairing need a quality paint regime which should include a glass flake paint. Two coats of primer a barrier coat the antifoul does not cut it.
Hi William,
I explained my concerns about metal rudders on fibreglass boats in my discussion with Andre. As to a one off metal rudder in SS being cheeper than a Foss rudder, I’m highly sceptical, that is assuming an apples to apples comparison with labour and design included.
Also, I think I wrote three coats of barrier. Considering that this is a pretty standard treatment for fibreglass boats with a long term track record, in my opinion it does “cut it”.
Hi John,
After lurking for nearly a year (and enjoying the new and archived content of AAC anonymously) you’ve hit on a topic that I’m currently dealing with, namely the impending replacement of the skeg-hung rudder on our 1997 Caliber 40 LRC in the Pacific Northwest. I have read on several Caliber owners’ forums of wet rudders found during surveys (more validation of the importance of a good pre-purchase survey) or during routine haulouts. Our rudder was found to be wet both by tapping and by moisture meter last May, and we received a concession on price to have it investigated. When we finally hauled out this month to do further examination of the moisture, the rudder was observed to be delaminating and weeping water from a 10″ crack on the port surface. We apparently hauled out not a moment too soon!
The original Caliber rudders were built by Foss Foam in Florida, and as you suggested, the molds are still available. We’ve decided to completely replace the rudder stock and web, rather than try to re-use those components, both because we would always be suspicious of the metal and weld integrity, and our plan to embark on offshore cruising in the next 5 years. We’re expecting the total cost of the rudder with shipping to be somewhere around $5000.
One thing that didn’t come up in your recounting of your discussions with Foss was that painting the rudder a dark color is not advised, as it may contribute to expansion and contraction from exposure to sun and accelerate deterioration. Written instructions recommending light bottom paint colors for the rudder were found in the original boat documentation but of course ours was painted a very nice Interlux blue. I’ve seen recent photos of some of the Caliber rudder replacements with white rudders in response to that guidance. After incurring the cost of a new rudder, no one is taking any chances!
Another option besides Foss I discovered while exploring alternative sources was Competition Composites Inc. (CCI; formerly Phil’s Foils) in Ontario, Canada. They can take 3D scans of your existing rudder and use CNC machining to produce two halves of solid foam core to sandwich the rudder post, and skin the rudder core in fiberglass. The least expensive option is to use your existing rudder stock and web, but you could also have them build a carbon fiber post (for considerably greater cost, of course.) Here’s a link to their general process: http://fastcomposites.ca/publications/WhitePapers/BetterSpadeRudder.pdf. The estimate to build a new rudder for my boat re-using the old rudder post and web was considerably less expensive than the Foss estimate, but did not include the additional cost for shipping of the old rudder on a custom oversize pallet to Canada and return shipment of the new rudder.
Sorry about the length of my comments, but I thought I could add more detail to your 2-part article with my in-progress rudder replacement and another potential avenue for members to consider.
Hi Frank,
Thanks for a great comment full of useful information. I had not thought of light paint idea. At first blush I was sceptical that it would really make any difference given that the rudder is immersed in relatively cool water, but then again the top of the Caliber rudder is not immersed when she is not sailing, so perhaps it does. That said, my guess is that the crack is likely the result of freezing while the boat was hauled? Where has the boat been stored?
And one other question, did the original rudder have mild steel or stainless steel plates?
Also, thanks for the tip on Competition Composites. I will definitely investigate.
A fine example of a member post full of useful info. I had never considered the light paint on an exposed rudder option, either. I knew about Phil’s/CC because I hang out with racers here in Ontario, and they are well-regarded. I did not, however, know about “Florida Foss” and “Not Florida Foss”. This place goes deep…
Hi Frank
Interesting that you would consider choosing another Foss rudder when you have a failed model in front of you!
The CCI process is similar to what I have been suggesting for cedar. However my earlier comment about race boat engineering still holds true as the samples on the CCI web site all are designed with the light-is-right mentality. CoreCell is certainly an excellent foam, but it is usually found in 4# and 6# density. Your boat is no race boat. Get CCI to machine yours from 20# foam, make sure they only use epoxy resin, and include the O-ring seals as I suggested and you’ll be golden.
Informative video from sailor Patrick Childress when he opens up the rudder of his 40 year old Valiant 40; drop, cut open, inspect, fix, close, reinstall.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JF7GfY6UifQ
Enjoy
AKA how not to repair your rusty old Valiant rudder. Interesting that Childress found the foam “rubbery” which means it has little structural strength, but proceeded with a small localized patch. The same author has another video in which he cuts a square section out of his foredeck under his windlass where the core is rotted out and then shows us how not to properly repair high stress areas of the deck.
re Foss/Caliber rudders: I don’t consider a 23 year service life from new to potential catastrophic failure an acceptable product life expectancy for such a mission critical item.
I think that it is a slippery slope to be criticising individuals based upon watching a video of them. We all have different standards. It must also be taken into consideration the budget involved and the location in which work is being done. I wish PC all the best in his ventures to circumnavigate.
Hi Gari Wyn
I agree in principle that the level of discourse on this site should remain at the level of technique rather than the personal— and as moderator John certainly works to uphold that standard. To his credit, John is not afraid of using himself as an example when he screwed up and learned from it.
On the other hand, Patric Childress represents himself as an expert, giving advice to wanta-be cruisers through a regular series of video presentations. As such he should be subject to technical criticism when he advocates procedures that appear to be erogenous. And as a self-promoted expert he should not have his identity hidden from future viewers.
When somebody opens up a small section of a rudder and finds rusty, improperly designed connections to the shaft surrounded by “rubbery foam” and elects to re-weld it and cover it with a patch they have not performed a seaworthy repair and should not be encouraging others to follow their expert advice. When they cut a square hole in the fore deck of a Valiant 40 of that vintage and find completely rotted balsa core it is not sufficient to reef out a bit of core under the remaining deck at the edge of the hole, shove some fiberglass under the 90 degree edge, and glass it over. If the bedding compound under the adjoining mooring cleats is of the quality I have observed on every Uniflite Valiant I have surveyed it will have long ago failed and rotted out the core under the critical cleat.
We may all have different standards, but when we venture out onto the ocean on a small boat the Ocean doesn’t care what we personally think. Rudders either steer the boat or they fail. Standing rigging either stands or it falls. And when you are praying your anchor holds during a Category 4 hurricane you better pray that the windlass will not pull out of the foredeck if that is all that is holding the boat to the anchor.
Hi Gari and Richard,
Please leave this here. I know that I make plenty of mistakes but all the same comment moderation is my job, and mine alone.
I know that seems dictatorial but the fact is that experience has shown that often when two members get into a back and forth about what is, or is not, appropriate for the comments, it tends to escalate to a bad place, and none of us need that in these troubled times.
Thanks
Thanks everyone for the comments and questions. John’s 2-part article resonated with me as it reflected much of my experience in considering how to replace my own rudder. I recently heard a boat show instructor paraphrase an aphorism about boats, something like “bad decisions and compromises.” Anyone know the actual saying? We’ve probably all made a lot of the latter, and hopefully only a few of the former.
Choosing Foss Foam in Florida for a new rudder for me was a compromise compared to the optimal solution of having a CNC-machined solid foam core rudder built around a new rudder post, that considered not only turnaround time, cost, the existence of the original molds at Foss, and that the original rudder had lasted 23 years. I hope to get at least another 23 years from the new one and plan to paint it a light color fwiw.
BTW, in response to John’s question about the west coast and Florida Fosses, I too have heard from yard managers and read on other forums that there is a difference. This includes availability of molds for your particular rudder.
Hi Frank,
I think you made a good call. Is a Foss rudder the ultimate? Clearly not. But the cost is reasonable and known, and it’s a predictable solution rather than taking on all the unknowns of a custom/ultimate. It won’t cost you much in your time, and best of all you will be out there sailing again. Perfect is the enemy of good. Done is better than perfect.
I see you are familiar with my carpentry. Still, good advice.
A couple of things: Is the Duplex stainless the same as this Aquamet 22? http://www.matweb.com/search/datasheettext.aspx?matguid=93ff84a2e8f64e5a80acc8d5e352e331 I just got a new rudder from Foss, and they used 316, which is ok but perhaps not as resistant to corrosion. On quality of their current products over past, one of the things I like is they now rout out and seal with 5200 the glass/post interface. Much better chance of resisting water intrusion. Finally, on the light color: as I understand it, Foss is concerned with foam expansion when the boat is on the hard and sun is glaring down on the rudder. They say if you want to use dark paint, just make sure you drape the exposed rudder with a white cloth. I cannot believe an exposed tip sticking out of the water would be a problem, especially if it were tucked under a transom, but you could always ask Al or Dave.
Hi Terence,
That makes sense on the colour. I should have thought of the situation when the boat is out of the water…duh.
Sorry, I don’t know if Duplex is the same as Aquamet, but I’m guessing one ofthe engineers will.
I had a rudder for my valiant 40 made by Foss Foam Florida last spring. The boat was in Green Cove Springs about 1 1/2 hrs from Foss at the time. I drove the old rudder to them on the roof of my Outback and picked up the new one a couple weeks later. Being able to see and talk to them face to face and see the operation was a plus. I was willing to have a new shaft made but they assured me after inspection that the old one was in great shape. As someone who use to make similar rudders back in the day I can say the quality is good. Great people to work with too. I put a couple thousand easy miles on it last summer. Not enough for any conclusions but so far so good.
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the report, great to have. Did they replace the plates or straps welded to the old shaft, or were those still in good shape too?
I had given the okay to replace the plates and shaft if needed. I actually expected that they would need to. They were not rushed. I told them to take whatever time was needed but they found the shaft and plates to be in very good shape. I can’t find the record of what I paid but it was under 3k.
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the fill, and definitely a cost effective solution.
Hi Mark,
Thinking about this job for our Valiant 40…. what year was your Valiant built?
And, Mark, what were the symptoms, if any, that led to the rudder work?
Thanks, Dick Stevenson, s/v Alchemy
Hi Terence
Aquamet 22 is close to duplex 2205- yield strength 380 to 480 for duplex, brinel hardness 341 to 293, corrossion resistance Pren 34 to 35.
Chemical composition while similar eg Cr 22 to 23 has differences eg Mn 5 to 2 and particularly Carbon .06 to .03
This higher carbon will give issues with welds and carbide precipitation so requiring annealing after welding for the Aquamet.
Duplex 2205 welds also have to be treated by mechanical abrasion or pickling.
Hi William,
Thanks for fielding that. I had no clue.
Lagoon uses Fibreglass rudder shafts in many of their cats. Seem to work well and no corrosion. They look to be solid glass, not tubes. VERY solid.
Comments?
Hi Paul,
The history of glass rudder shafts has not, as I understand it, been good. That said, perhaps the lagoon has a shallower rudder with less leverage so maybe it works?
Anyway, given that we are dealing with replacement here I would not try replacing a SS shaft with fibreglass, tube or shaft. Way too many possibilities for unintended consequences, I think, particularly since the two materials have very different properties.
Hi Paul,
Like John, my impression is that fiberglass rudderposts have a fairly poor track record with one manufacturer in particular having had several failures. The question then is was it a design/construction error or is there a fundamental reason why it is not as good. There are a few key differences in properties between fiberglass and stainless.
One important difference is modulus of elasticity which is a measure of how stiff the material is. Depending on the exact layup used, the modulus of fiberglass is 3-10X lower than that of 316 stainless (3X is the realm of E-glass and most other stuff is close to the 10X end of the range). This means that you need a larger diameter rudder post to get the appropriate stiffness affecting what the rudder profile can be. While people love to talk about how strong stuff is, my experience is that I am limited by stiffness of parts far more often than by the strength when I design stuff. For a rudder, if the shaft is not stiff enough you can have everything from mushy helm feel to contact of the rudder and hull to binding in the bearings to cables coming off the quadrant, it is all dependent on the design. The only solution is to go bigger in diameter which affects the foil shape of the rudder.
Fiberglass can actually be stronger than 316 stainless but if you exclude E-glass and S-glass, you are usually looking at a laminate that is less than half the strength. Composites are ever more particular about how you specify them than metals, specifying frp alone is no guarentee of what you will get. This again means that you need to go larger in diameter.
Stainless is quite easy to make plain bearings for, there are many grades of plastic that work well. Fiberglass is a bit trickier of a material to put in a plain bearing application and get good life from. Similar to bearings, shaft seals/stuffing boxes are trickier.
The really appealing thing about fiberglass is that you can make everything out of the same material which holds up really well in a marine environment. I find this aspect really compelling and for certain applications where the shortcomings could be dealt with, I believe that it could make this the best option but you can’t simply design for stainless then substitute fiberglass.
Eric
I’ve run into rudder issues on my 1983 Cal 35-2 and at the end of the day decided to have a new one built by Foss Foam, Newport, CA. I’m doing this for peace of mind decided by the hassle of transport and rebuilding of a rudder that is very heavy (loaded with water) and suspect at best. It’s a no brainer for me. Additionally, the new rudder will be of a slightly different design, more fluid dynamic, and a bit shorter than the original which reached down nearly as far as the keel. I’ll also be carrying a lot less weight at the stern. The cost including shipping is about $2500. A lot less than what was anticipated. To me, rebuilding a waterlogged 37 year old rudder would never allow me peace of mind. I plan on using the West System rudder bearing replacement process to eliminate the sloppiness after I hone down the tube. I was surprised to find there were no actual bearings when I dropped the rudder. It is simply the stainless steel rudder stock inside a plastic tube that’s enclosed in fiberglass. Built into the current fiberglass & thru the plastic tube are nipples for injecting grease, which I’ve done over the years. A lot of suggestions have been made concerning the total removal of the tube, but that would see, to result in a real fuster cluck. The process for West System can be found on page 62 of their catalog/manual…
Hi Edward,
I agree completely. Please let us know how it goes with Foss of California. And thanks for the tip on the West Manual. I will add that to the chapter.
Hi Edward
The graphite/epoxy bearing procedure as invented by the Gougeons can make your helm feel like it has ball bearings. One minor trick– Wrap the shaft with a single layer of plumbers teflon tape– it provides a few thousands clearance to avoid binding, and will eventually go away. Unfortunately I don’t have a long term report on the one I did, but it was sure nice during the test sail.
Hi all,
Perhaps I have missed it but am I correct in thinking:
That, in terms of rudder interior structure design, that most rudders have their splines “butt” welded to the shaft.
I would think that “A” frame construction would be far stronger. “A” frame meaning that the spline would come from the sides of the shaft meeting at the aft end of the rudder. Coming from the sides would allow for greater surface area for the welds in addition to two welds to the shaft for each splice pair. The “A” frame angle off the shaft would make for a far stiffer spline: butt welded splines would seem to me to be prone to “wag”, especially when the welds start to deteriorate: accelerating the rudder’s ultimate demise.
I would think that the increase in structural integrity would easily offset the increased cost.
Do either of the Foss companies employ this design: or, what am I missing in my cabin-fever induced speculation about this issue?
My best, Dick Stevenson, s/v Alchemy
Hi Dick,
Good idea. That’s pretty much what Foss of Florida do as standard, with straps wrapped around the shaft:
https://www.newrudders.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/rudderstep3.jpg
Hi John, Good to know. Wrapping the spline strap around the shaft makes even more sense. Dick
Hi John,
Graphite s used with stainless steel in seawater will cause crevice and pitting corrossion.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/002199839002400105?journalCode=jcma
Also the A frame shown in the left photo should have a horizontal plate with lightening holes to avoid flexing when the stock rotates, and to give a very large area of weld to the stock.
This weld should be both top and bottom and should be done in 1 inch increments with cooling between to avoid bending the stock.
Hi William,
Yes, I wondered about that too, particularly since I know that mixing graphite and aluminium is not a good idea. That said the people at WEST are very good at what they do and don’t, in my experience, put stuff in their manuals that does not work.
Maybe the problem with stainless is slow enough acting to be acceptable when balanced against the alternative of cutting the whole tube out of the boat and starting again. Anyway, I would certainly want to check the stock for problems every few years.
Hi John,
Personally, I would ream out the tube and then epoxy in a Vesconite Hi lube bearing.https://www.vesconite.com/vesconite-hilube/
Although these are normally thicker they can be machined to a thin wall.
Graphite is the most active material on the galvanic scale.
It would become an issue if the yacht was unused, ie stagnant water, and therefore no oxygen, or if the water temperature was higher than 25 – 26 C as this increases the chemical reaction .
Another important consideration is that the stainless steel surface should be highly polished so pitting is harder to start. Once pitting starts, the pits have a different potential to the rest of the shaft, and the shaft will corrode rapidly . This will be accelerated by the graphite.
The issue is whether the shaft can retain it`s thin protective film, which will help keep the reaction under control, and if not, a galvanic coupling will be established, which will be in direct proportion to the water temperature.
An excellent article on this is http://www.atlassteels.com.au/documents/TN7-Galvanic_Corrosion_rev_Aug_2010.pdf.
Please note that this does not take water temperature into consideration.
I would not expect a problem where you normally cruise, but in the Bahamas a sudden failure of the shaft in under 3 months would not surprise.
In the same way batteries reduce performance in the cold, galvanic couplings accelerate in warmer water.
Hi William,
Good information, thank you. However I’m at a loss on how one would practically ream the old bearing out in a boat yard situation with limited tools and still keep everything true enough to press in a new bearing. Don’t get me wrong, I’m a big believer in design for purpose bearing materials and in fact changed our rudder bearing to Thordon some years ago: https://thordonbearings.com/marine-markets
But on the other hand I had a metal bearing carrier (aluminium boat) to work with as well as a brilliant machinist. Also, this was an expensive fix and not easy to do.
Given that, if I were really going to fix this right on a fibreglass boat I think replacing the tube and adding jefa bearings might be more practical for an amateur, although far from easy.
Also, I would doubt that real damage could be done in three months, although I do agree that strange stuff happens when SS goes active due to loss of the film.
It’s a hard one, but on balance I’m fairly sure that if there had been problems WEST would have pulled the recommendation from their manual years ago. Or to put it another way, I think this maybe one of those times where perfect is the enemy of better.
Hi John,
Personally, I would ream out the tube and then epoxy in a Vesconite Hi lube bearing.https://www.vesconite.com/vesconite-hilube/
Although these are normally thicker they can be machined to a thin wall.
Graphite is the most active material on the galvanic scale.
It would become an issue if the yacht was unused, ie stagnant water, and therefore no oxygen, or if the water temperature was higher than 25 – 26 C as this increases the galvanic reaction .
Another important consideration is that the stainless steel surface should be highly polished so pitting is harder to start. Once pitting starts, the pits have a different potential to the rest of the shaft, and the shaft will corrode rapidly . This will be accelerated by the graphite.
The issue is whether the shaft can retain it`s thin protective film, which will help keep the reaction under control, and if not, a galvanic coupling will be established, which will be in direct proportion to the water temperature.
An excellent article on this is http://www.atlassteels.com.au/documents/TN7-Galvanic_Corrosion_rev_Aug_2010.pdf.
Please note that this does not take water temperature into consideration.
I would not expect a problem where you normally cruise, but in the Bahamas a sudden failure of the shaft in under 3 months would not surprise.
In the same way batteries reduce performance in the cold, galvanic couplings accelerate in warmer water.
Hi John,
An easy way to ream a bearing is to use a hole saw on ply and then glue these together to make around 100mm thick.
The diameter should be about 15-20mm less than the shaft.
Then bolt together using a threaded rod say 10mm.
Now glue a non clogging sandpaper to the outside of the circular ply.
Use a cordless drill on the threaded rod, and run up the bearing.
The cordless will stall without damage if you get out of alignment.
Apologies for the double comment.
Hi William,
That’s a good idea, and I think it could work in many cases. That said, I think that anyone who took that on should be mentally prepared to replace the entire tube if things don’t go well. The problem, I think, will be after we have removed part of the bearing material and there is then some play between the tool and the remaining bearing. Given that, I’m thinking that one might even need two or more tools each slightly bigger than the last. The point being that the slightest inaccuracy in the reaming process will either damage the tube or result in binding from misalignment once the new bearing is in.
Further I think that the chances of success with this method will depend a lot on each situation. For example if the wear on the existing bearing is bad it will be harder to ream it out evenly. Or if the tube is quite thin walled, the chances of damaging it will go up.
Also, with the amount of material that must be removed with the typical full length bearing we will need a way to replace the sandpaper frequently, so I don’t think just gluing it will work.
Sorry to sound negative, but having done scores of tricky repairs to boats over some 50 years one thing I have learned the hard way is that doing something like this is fraught with ways to screw up and that the details can be a bitch.
In summary, if it were me and I did not want to use the WEST option, I think I would go straight to replacing the whole tube and adding Jefa bearings, a process that while a lot of work, is, I think, less prone to problems, particularly if one uses WEST products and instructions. Also a long term fix that will enhance the boat.
It seams that not only Lagoon but also Beneteau (both part of the Beneteau Group of companies) are using fiberglass rudder stocks. My Beneteau Oceanis 48 (model year 2012) is using one for the single spade rudder.
See photo here: https://www.icloud.com/sharedalbum/de-de/#B0e5nhQSTlirVO
To me it seems that fiberglass rudder stocks – as long as the engineering is done correctly, what I would expect from the largest boatbuilding company on earth – is a great solution without many of the problems of SS rudder stocks.
I have no idea, though, what aging does to those FRP rudder stocks over the decades. Does anybody in this forum know what to watch out for with those constructions?
Hi Klaus,
The challenge with fibreglass rudder stocks is that that they are very flexible. The result is that they are not a practical replacement for a boat with a stainless stock.
As to the engineering at Beneteau, I’m sure they get it right for intended purpose, but it’s also important to realize that they also build to a tight budget so there are many incidences out there where their boats have had significant problems as they age or if subjected to any sort of hard usage, even that which would be expected in the life of a cruising boat:
https://www.morganscloud.com/2014/06/05/cheeki-rafiki-tragedy-time-for-changes/
Another example is that the foam inside older Beneteau rudders has a poor track record because apparently they used cheap 2 lb foam. On the bright side, apparently the steel work in older Beneteau rudder was better than the average for less expensive production boats:
https://www.morganscloud.com/2020/03/08/planning-and-budgeting-a-refit-rudders-part-1-the-problem-defined/
I’m not sure how to monitor a fibreglass stock for deterioration. Generally the first signs of deterioration in GRP laminate strength is increased flexing but I don’t know how one would monitor that on a rudder.
Hi Klaus,
We have the older 2003 Beneteau 473, that has the same rudder construction. There are thousands of our yachts on the water (including Lagoon cats as you say, but also larger and smaller models than ours using the same construction), and many are clocking up big sea miles, with very happy owners. Here’s my take on the rudder system that we have taken offshore.
Construction – a stainless collar attached to the lower shaft, bearing inside a copper bush moulded into the hull directly below the well built rudder tube.
I knew of Beneteau(s) having issues with the lower bearing failing, as these were set by the factory using adhesive sealant, which breaks down with use. But I know of none where the shaft itself has failed, not even from collision or grounding, though I am sure some must have. So I surmise that our “FRP” spade rudder and shaft are “strong enough”, but also understand they are composite construction (with E-glass or alike), but can’t be certain.
To go offshore we had to have our 14.3m boat lifted and Cat 1 inspected, which showed more play than desirable in our lower rudder bearing. To get the rudder out we had to have the whole boat raised higher on the dock cradle, but cleaning out and re-setting the bush with epoxy glue was a long lasting and relatively simple fix. From then on, dropping the rudder to inspect and clean the tube and bearings is a one hour job for 2 people max, and the boat doesn’t need to be raised again, as the inspection and clean can be done in a normal cradle position. We will do this before every offshore voyage, or every five years or so.
If the worst happens and you strike an angry vengeful whale or floating container mid-Atlantic, at least your F( or C )RP rudder will break off cleanly. You can then steer with your jury rudder system to the nearest major safe port, and order a new rudder from stock at Beneteau Europe or the USA. This can be air-freighted to you wherever you are.
Many yacht abandonments seem to be caused by a damaged rudder staying in place and wave action on the bent rudder breaking up the hull causing flooding, or the vessel becoming uncontrollable due to a rudder locked hard-over to one-side. We are unlikely to experience this as the shaft will be sacrificial to the reinforced rudder tube, and massive hull lay-up (on the 473 any way).
Br. Rob
Hi John,
Thank you for your answer. I have been reading the refit and rudder articles, that’s why I started thinking about how to survey a FRP rudder stock for fitness.
For sure FRP is not a replacement for a SS rudder stock, I might have been misleading in my post. I guess the fiberglass rudder stock would need to have a much bigger diameter to deliver the needed strength. On my Beneteau 48 it has a diameter of 140 mm / 5.5 inches at the rudder end where it enters the hull, with a light displacement of the boat of about 11,800kg / 26,000lbs.
What I ask myself is, if one has a fiberglass rudder stock on the boat, is it easier to survey, more safe to assume that it is (still) ok?
And if you plan to buy a used boat with a fiberglass rudder stock, would it be easier to be certain that it is not compromised, versus a SS one?
As for „tight budget“ mass produced boats: The Cheeki Rafiki story is why I did not wanted to make compromises after I had a grounding a few years earlier, some superficial repair by a European yard afterwards and then small hairline cracks coming back near the keel plates after fighting a storm with short and steep waves a year after the first repair. All before planning to leave for an Atlantic crossing. A Cheeki Rafiki incident must not happen to me and my (mostly family) crew, for sure!
That is why I mandated a supersonic surveyor before leaving for the Atlantic to check whether the bonding of the inner structure glued into the hull of the boat is ok. When this survey suggested some areas might not be bonded as they should/could be, I invested $20.000,- to cut open all the inner structure and do a re-lamination of the inner structure to the hull to strengthen the boat and keel-to-hull connection. On a four year old boat this might be a bit over the top for some.
See some photos here: https://www.icloud.com/sharedalbum/de-de/#B0e5nhQSTlirVO
My thinking has been and still is, safety comes first.
I believe with such a professional repair a Cheeki Rafiki incident should be avoidable. Hope knowledgeable people here on ACC do not disagree. At least I do not see any signs of fatigue off the hull-keel joint or around the keel bolts after more than 14,000 nautical miles finishing the Atlantic circle back to Europe last spring.
On the money spent for the repair: This Beneteau production boat had a price tag of less than 35% of a same sized Hallberg-Rassy. So why not invest serious money and effort in a thorough repair after a grounding? The repair costs has been just 3% of the price difference between this boat and a HR.
I know there is the question ready to be asked „why not buy a HR or trusted offshore brand in the first place?“. Could be for a lot of different reasons…
I hope my repair story is helpful for AAC readers.
Hi Klaus,
Thanks for sharing your repair story, very useful.
I’m just not qualified to opine on whether or not the same type of investigation and repair would have saved the Cheeki Rafiki crew, although, as I remember, the accident investigation did not mention sonic imaging, which is interesting.
On inspection, generally metals are easier to inspect and access than composites. First off it’s easier to access what the strength is when new since, for example, stainless steel is pretty standard stuff, as long as we know the grade, whereas there is no way to know how a composite was designed, just by inspecting it. And even if we know how it was designed, we can’t know, without destructive testing, whether of not it was built as designed.
And second there are pretty standard ways to check metals for fatigue—dye checking for stainless—whereas, as far as I know, there is no comparable non destructive testing for composites.
All that said, the bright side of a composite rudder stock is that provided the builder did the job right there are far fewer worries about water getting into the blade.
Correction:
Beneteau Oceanis 48 light displacement is 12,600 kg / 27,800 lbs.
I have found these articles very sobering.
I’m not in North America but in the UK, with a Camper and Nicholson boat. I have had the Whitlock Mamba steering gear rebuilt but that was the easy bit. Now I need to start on getting a replacement rudder. Is there any UK equivalent to Foss?
Hi Andrew,
I don’t know of any Foss equivalent in the UK, or Europe. You could get a custom shop to do it but I think that would be more costly than shipping both ways from Foss, even if they must build a mold for your boat. The good news is that Foss tell me (see article) that they have shipped all over the world. I suggest giving them a call and talking it over.
Thank you, John. Rather too many people in this country (including the highly proficient expert, with many miles at sea, who rebuilt the gear) seem to think that if you can’t actually waggle the blade on the stock, it’s OK!
I will ask around owners of sisters and perhaps we can get a bulk order going, to spread some of the costs.
Hi Andrew,
Yes, rudder problem denial is all too common. Silly when we think of it in the light of the fact that Foss can make a living just making replacement rudders—gotta tell us something.
Good idea on getting together on this, particularly to share the cost of the mold.
sorry guys, but that does look as Foss promotion.
Hi Ignat,
I calls ’em as I sees ’em. And yes I liked the guys at Foss, and to me that’s a good thing and a lot of what I take into account when evaluating a business. Also note that we got absolutely no benefit in money or in kind from Foss.
Bottom line, since I was impressed by them and felt they solved a problem, and the members who had used they were also happy how would you have had me write it? Maybe make up something negative to say just to be “balanced”?
Thanks All for this thread and commentary! It helped to convince me to have my rudder replaced. In my pre-purchase survey of an almost 50-year old Gulstar 50, thumping on the rudder made the same sound as a ripe watermelon! Fully saturated. So I bit the bullet and had the old rudder shipped to Foss Foam FL for disassembly and replacement. The internal web on the old rudder was a failure waiting to happen…
Best,
Peter
…The replacement leaves much more room for optimism!
Hi Peter,
Thanks very much for coming up with that. I can rant and rave about the importance of replacing rudders, but a real world story with graphic photos has way more impact.
Hi John – I would like to add another option to your rudder materials discussion.
As I see it, every conventional fiberglass-foam rudder is gradually corroding internally due to inevitable water entry where the stock enters the blade and oxygen starvation of the internal “stainless” steel. In just that manner the rudder on my 1985 Pearson 36 sailboat was leaking rusty water.
I decided to go the route of a new rudder with better corrosion mitigation. I went the unconventional route of commissioning a rudder from Ruddercraft in the USA. I did not have to send my old rudder, just provide a precise diagram and dimensions.
Their unique method is to create the rudder blade from two slabs of High-density Polyethylene (HDPE). Each slab is machined on the outside to form half of the foil profile, and machined on the inside surface to accommodate the rudder stock and framework – with additional top-to-bottom drainage channels. Rather than fighting the losing battle to keep water out, this design allows oxygenated water to pass over the 316 stainless steel, thus limiting corrosion.
The two sides are then bolted together over and through the internal framework. The HDPE edges are heat welded and recessed bolts are covered likewise. After sanding to create a fuzzy surface, a chlorinated rubber-based tie-coat primer bonded very well (Sea Hawk 1277).
Hi Ashley,
Well that is interesting and although I’m certainly no metals expert, does sound as if it would last longer. Certanly something for those looking at a new rudder to investigate.