The London Boatshow—A Real Disappointment

We just got back to our cottage in Nova Scotia from the London Boatshow. While the people we met and the old friends we reconnected with made it a great trip for Phyllis and me, and well worth while, I have to say that the show itself was a disappointment.

The trend toward focusing ever more on gadgets and ever less on seamanship and good boat design and build seems to continue unabated. Does it really matter if your plotter has a million features that you will probably never use and is connected by some whizbang network so it can display everything from your fuel consumption to how many cans of tomatoes you have left in the galley? Come to think of it, it does matter since all this interconnection now means that the whole works can crash at once. I’m as much a technology lover as anyone, having spent most of my business life in the computer industry, but this stuff is starting to bore me witless.

Two gadgets I did like: AIS transponders that will not only tell you about the ships around you but also tell them about you. Now that would be a real comfort when heaved-to in a gale, particularly if you had a bunch of gear like a sea anchor over the side. I also liked a new design passive radar reflector that claims to substantially upgrade radar visibility and will fit exactly where our old Firdel Blipper is mounted.

It was sad to see how few sailboats there were when compared to motorboats. (Maybe $100 a barrel oil will fix that.)

Of the few sailboats that were there, most were, in my never humble opinion, very poor offshore designs with flat U-shaped sections forward and wide sterns with too much buoyancy aft. Boats that will pound hard enough to shake your fillings out when going to windward offshore and bury their bows in every convenient wave. Add a lightly built spade rudder and a deep fin keel that will drive up through the bottom of the boat the first time you hit something, and you have a recipe for broken dreams.

The Hallberg Rassy 43 was an exception to the above although I still think the stern is a bit wide. However, there are some other issues:

  • the current deck-accessible storage might be just adequate for three fenders and two dock lines.
  • two heads and two showers on a 43’ boat is taking space that could be used more effectively.
  • the acres of teak, though beautiful, will require huge amounts of maintenance.

How about a voyaging version? No teak on deck, one head only and use the space saved for an expanded engine room and parts storage area with workbench. Cut down the cabins a bit and install a real lazarette and a decent sized locker forward. Combine these changes with HR’s undeniable quality (the engine and mechanical installation is a work of art) and the HR43 would be a nice voyaging boat, albeit at a hefty price.

A bright spot in all of this was Colin Speedie’s new Ovni that he has been writing about. This is definitely an offshore boat. When I got past the hard chines and flat area at the very bottom of the hull (so she can dry out) I realized that she might be a surprisingly sea-kindly hull too. Add to that the incredible value for money (at least in Euros) and Alubat’s willingness to make substantial customizations at a reasonable cost, and you have an interesting alternative to a custom-built boat in aluminum.

Of course there is the stability question that rears its head whenever we talk about centerboard boats, but I think this concern is overblown. Ovnis have been everywhere and centerboard boats like Seal and the Pelagics have seen a lot of heavy weather without any of their crews wearing them as a hat.

In summary, there are better boat shows for offshore sailors: Several people told me that both the Düsseldorf and Paris shows have more serious voyaging sailboats on display. Although I have not been to one for 10 years, I suspect that for North Americans the Annapolis Boat show is a much better value than trekking all the way to London.

Like what you just read? Get lots more:


Please Share

Meet the Author

John

John was born and brought up in Bermuda and started sailing as a child, racing locally and offshore before turning to cruising. He has sailed over 100,000 miles, most of it on his McCurdy & Rhodes 56, Morgan's Cloud, including eight ocean races to Bermuda, culminating in winning his class twice in the Newport Bermuda Race. He has skippered a series of voyages in the North Atlantic, the majority of which have been to the high latitudes. John has been helping others go voyaging by sharing his experience for twenty years, first in yachting magazines and, for the last 12 years, as co-editor/publisher of AAC.

2 comments… add one
  • Marc Dacey Jun 16, 2013, 4:03 pm

    Your most recent comment led me to this old post, John, and despite the exponential difference in our respective sailing experience (with you decades and 100,000s of NMs ahead of me), we share much in our opinions (or prejudices, if you prefer) on the qualities of a decent voyaging sailboat.

    I wrote about a more recent iteration of H-R’s designs here:

    http://alchemy2009.blogspot.ca/2013/03/introducing-one-fingered-boat.html

    You are not alone in your feeling that what is being sold is not what is suitable to the purpose of offshore passagemaking. I think perhaps where the disconnect is, however, is in the idea that very many people actually buy a boat to do things. They may purchase a boat sold on the basis of being “offshore-ready”, but never go more than coastal, and fair-weather coastal at that. This is analogous to the vast number of “sport utility vehicles” that are sold to people who never, ever use them for whatever sports or utilities for which they are allegedly designed.

    • John Jun 16, 2013, 4:12 pm

      So true!

Only logged in members may comment: