Gear failures & fixes—Anchoring
CQR anchor
The Problem:
When we bought Morgan’s Cloud in 1991, she
came with a 75lb CQR primary anchor that fit on
the bow roller beautifully. Over the next few
years we made cruises throughout the North
Atlantic and associated Arctic waters. Our rule
was that once north of Newfoundland we did not
even try the CQR but used our 150lb Luke fisherman type
anchor with all the attendant hassles; and believe
me, there are many. We simply believed the wisdom
of the time that 'stockless anchors don’t work in
the high latitudes'.
We also had a terrible time getting the CQR to
stick in the hard sand of the Bahamas and even in
my native Bermuda. In 2001 we cruised Norway and
continued to have a bad time with the CQR, often
trying two or three potential anchorages before
getting it to set, or giving up altogether and
tying to a wharf.
I should stop here and say that we don’t consider
an anchor securely set until it can withstand 1800
RPM (about 3/4 power) in reverse from our 120 hp
engine driving a three blade max prop. A tough
standard, but we have never dragged after applying
it.
Manufacturer's Response:
None, not contacted.
The Outcome:
In 2000, we bought a 30kg (66lb) SPADE anchor and quickly found that, despite being lighter than the CQR and set on rope, it set faster and held
better. So toward the end of the 2001 sailing
season in Norway we put the SPADE on our chain
rode. Suddenly we were getting anchored securely
everywhere despite its relatively small size.
That winter we put a 55kg (120lb) SPADE on the
primary bow roller on chain, moved the 30kg (66lb)
SPADE to our secondary bow roller on rope, and our
anchoring problems were over. Since then we have
cruised Norway, Svalbard, Iceland, Greenland and
Newfoundland, anchoring hundreds of times,
sometimes in some very unfavorable bottom types
and often on a very short scope. The SPADE has
only failed to set twice (in very thin mud and in
roller bearing type rocks) and has never dragged
once set. We have not needed to use the Luke since
getting the big SPADE. (See our
Stuff that works
page for more information on the SPADE.)
Lessons
Learned:
-
In offshore sailing we often go along for years
with poor gear without ever questioning the
prevailing wisdom that this is as good as it gets.
Does anyone else remember that incredibly
dangerous machine, the halyard reel winch? For
years after the drum winch became readily
available, we were told that we had to put up with
this wrist breaking monster on the main halyard
because it was unseamanlike to use rope halyards
or have a rope to wire splice take the load when
reefed. It's hard to believe now.
-
Be open to new technology. We still see the
majority of cruisers out there with old style
anchors when there are several much better modern
designs available. The SPADE is only one option;
we have heard good things about the Rocna and
several other new designs.
-
Upsize your anchor—a lot. We are convinced that
the increase in anchor holding as size increases
is far more than linear. We also think that once
you get over 45kg (100lb) you enter a new world of
holding and setting capability. I can hear many of
you now, 'I’m not putting all that weight on the
bow!' But have you thought of going to high
tensile chain—G4 or even G7—which will allow you
to reduce at least one size on the chain and more
than make up for the weight of a bigger anchor?
This has been Steve Dashew’s approach for years.
-
Don’t be fooled by the tests. The CQR and other
old design anchors often do relatively well in
them, but we, and many other experienced cruisers,
have not had those results in the real world.
-
Don’t let the hassles of modifying your boat’s bow
roller to fit a new style anchor stop you from
getting one. It will be worth the expense and
aggravation, believe me.
To return to the page you came from, please use
your browser's back arrow.

|
|
|
|
|
Last
edited on
Tuesday February 05, 2008
Please read the following:
COPYRIGHT:
All information on this website is the copyright of John
Harries and/or Phyllis Nickel. All rights reserved.
FAIR USE: Notwithstanding the above, it is perfectly
acceptable for you to use quotes of a reasonable length from
this website, as long as you include an attribution with a link
to this website. DISCLAIMER:
Nothing on this website or in direct communications received
from us, or in our articles in the media, should be construed to
mean or imply that the high latitudes are anything other than a
hazardous place to take a boat. Dangers such as, but not limited
to, extreme weather, cold, ice, lack of help or assistance, and
poor charting could injure or kill you and wreck your boat.
Decisions to cruise the high latitudes, where you go, and how
you equip your boat, are yours and yours alone. The information
on this web site is based on what has worked for us in the past,
but that does not mean it will work for you, or that it is the
best, or even a good way for you to do things. |
|